>
> No, Wimax is quite a different system.
>
> Wimax works on the 3,5 GHz frequency band, and is meant for internet.
>
> 4G is the successor for 3 G, and works on the 800 MHz and on the 2,6 GHz frequency band.
> On the 800 MHz band it is meant for stationairy use, on the 2,6 GHz band it is meant for mobile use.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Ole Alstrup
>   To: [hidden email]
>   Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 1:48 PM
>   Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: 4G Technology
>
>
>   Thanks to those who sent all the links - tons of stuff to go through - a bit
>   overwhelming - could someone make it short and "sweet" for me right now?
>
>
>   Basically I want to know:
>
>   * The preferred transmission system for 4G is Wimax?
>   * Are new cellular towers to be put up for 4G and are these just as many or
>   more than the number of 3G towers?
>
>
>
>   ________________________________
>   From: stephen_vandevijvere <stephen_vandevijvere@...>
>   To: [hidden email]
>   Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 13:05:09
>   Subject: [eSens] Re: 4G Technology
>
>
>   28 FEB 2011
>   Jerusalem:
>
>   Officials say upgrading infrastructure to for 4G cellular phones could
>   increase use of such technologies and increase public's exposure to
>   radiation.
>
>   The Health and Environmental Protection ministries told the
>   Communications Ministry on Sunday that they will oppose the expansion
>   of cellular phone infrastructure to accommodate "fourth-generation"
>   (4G) devices, at least until any health effects from the radiation are
>   examined in depth.
>   Source: http://www.jpost.com/Health/Article.aspx?id=210138
>
>   --- In [hidden email], pamela clemonts <adiaha22@> wrote:
>   >
>   > I really feel you...are you in the U.S.? I guess 5G will be the next craze.Â
>   >I'm in NJ and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with these solar panels
>   >that they've put in front of many houses, schools, businesses and municipal
>   >buildings. I guess they must be 4G, as well. I get fried on almost every
>   >street now. No one ever asked anyone's permission. They have only been up
>   >for about 6 to 10 months with the complete arrays only about 6 to 8 months.Â
>   >Most people do not notice these things. If they don't feel them (most don't),
>   >they won't see them. For me, these solar panels have replaced cell phone masts
>   >as the most annoying frequencies because they are almost everywhere amping up
>   >everything.Â
>   >
>   > Â
>   > I guess I won't find that discussion online here until the new system finds its
>   >way into your communities. I wonder if they are a part of the new Smart Meter
>   >technology. I recall hearing that they were apart of the "smart grid"
>   >technology. You all are in for quite a treat with this technology. It's like
>   >frying in WIFI but a few times stronger, 24/7- down almost every block. Oh
>   >here's the clinch...
>   > Â
>   > PSE&G had the contract with Petra Solar to place 200,000 in municipalities
>   >throughout NJ back in early summer. Then in around July, they contracted with
>   >AT&T to set-up a wireless connection between each panel. I walk, which is
>   >utterly loathsome--but technically, driving is equally bothersome in
>   >this "brave new world." Â
>   > Â
>   > Maybe we should each wait to see where it all ends up, because it seems that
>   >as soon as we catch up with a new technology...the next is waiting in the wings
>   >to dwarf that one.Â
>   > Â
>   > Hang in there my people...strap yourselves in... It's going to be quite a
>   >ride~Â Love you guys!
>   > Â
>   > --- On Mon, 2/28/11, alstrup@ <alstrup@> wrote:
>   >
>   >
>   > From: alstrup@ <alstrup@>
>   > Subject: [eSens] 4G Technology
>   > To: [hidden email]
>   > Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 2:37 PM
>   >
>   >
>   > Â
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > Can anyone direct me to some appropriate sites about the new emerging 4G
>   >wireless technology. It appears that this is intended to replace the current 3G
>   >technology. I wonder how much worse this is than 3G. I read that there are two
>   >transmission technologies used for 4G, but I dont know the transmission
>   >spectrums. How are the transmission towers set up and do they require the same
>   >number of towers than 3G or more? I really dread this new technology.
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
>
>
>
>
>
>        
>
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------------
>
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>