Posted by
alstrup on
Mar 03, 2011; 2:57pm
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/4G-Technology-tp2597700p2626132.html
OK many thanks for that info Charles.
Anyone happen to know about the 4G requirements for cellular towers?
________________________________
From: charles <
[hidden email]>
To:
[hidden email]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 15:29:37
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: 4G Technology
No, Wimax is quite a different system.
Wimax works on the 3,5 GHz frequency band, and is meant for internet.
4G is the successor for 3 G, and works on the 800 MHz and on the 2,6 GHz
frequency band.
On the 800 MHz band it is meant for stationairy use, on the 2,6 GHz band it is
meant for mobile use.
Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton
----- Original Message -----
From: Ole Alstrup
To:
[hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: 4G Technology
Thanks to those who sent all the links - tons of stuff to go through - a bit
overwhelming - could someone make it short and "sweet" for me right now?
Basically I want to know:
* The preferred transmission system for 4G is Wimax?
* Are new cellular towers to be put up for 4G and are these just as many or
more than the number of 3G towers?
________________________________
From: stephen_vandevijvere <
[hidden email]>
To:
[hidden email]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 13:05:09
Subject: [eSens] Re: 4G Technology
28 FEB 2011
Jerusalem:
Officials say upgrading infrastructure to for 4G cellular phones could
increase use of such technologies and increase public's exposure to
radiation.
The Health and Environmental Protection ministries told the
Communications Ministry on Sunday that they will oppose the expansion
of cellular phone infrastructure to accommodate "fourth-generation"
(4G) devices, at least until any health effects from the radiation are
examined in depth.
Source:
http://www.jpost.com/Health/Article.aspx?id=210138--- In
[hidden email], pamela clemonts <adiaha22@...> wrote:
>
> I really feel you...are you in the U.S.? I guess 5G will be the next craze.Â
>I'm in NJ and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with these solar panels
>that they've put in front of many houses, schools, businesses and municipal
>buildings. I guess they must be 4G, as well. I get fried on almost every
>street now. No one ever asked anyone's permission. They have only been up
>for about 6 to 10 months with the complete arrays only about 6 to 8 months.Â
>Most people do not notice these things. If they don't feel them (most don't),
>they won't see them. For me, these solar panels have replaced cell phone masts
>as the most annoying frequencies because they are almost everywhere amping up
>everything.Â
>
> Â
> I guess I won't find that discussion online here until the new system finds its
>
>way into your communities. I wonder if they are a part of the new Smart Meter
>technology. I recall hearing that they were apart of the "smart grid"
>technology. You all are in for quite a treat with this technology. It's like
>frying in WIFI but a few times stronger, 24/7- down almost every block. Oh
>here's the clinch...
> Â
> PSE&G had the contract with Petra Solar to place 200,000 in municipalities
>throughout NJ back in early summer. Then in around July, they contracted with
>AT&T to set-up a wireless connection between each panel. I walk, which is
>utterly loathsome--but technically, driving is equally bothersome in
>this "brave new world." Â
> Â
> Maybe we should each wait to see where it all ends up, because it seems that
>as soon as we catch up with a new technology...the next is waiting in the wings
>to dwarf that one.Â
> Â
> Hang in there my people...strap yourselves in... It's going to be quite a
>ride~Â Love you guys!
> Â
> --- On Mon, 2/28/11, alstrup@... <alstrup@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: alstrup@... <alstrup@...>
> Subject: [eSens] 4G Technology
> To:
[hidden email]
> Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 2:37 PM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
> Can anyone direct me to some appropriate sites about the new emerging 4G
>wireless technology. It appears that this is intended to replace the current 3G
>technology. I wonder how much worse this is than 3G. I read that there are two
>transmission technologies used for 4G, but I dont know the transmission
>spectrums. How are the transmission towers set up and do they require the same
>number of towers than 3G or more? I really dread this new technology.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]