>
>
>
> Hi Drasko
>
> Have you tried the Bioprotect card then?
>
> Thanks
> Kikkie
>
> --- In [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, "Drasko"
> <cvijovic@...> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > Have I mentioned some months ago I was very happy with my LaVita gypsum
> protection boards, and that they don't make a weird feeling known from metal
> Faraday cages?! Well, I was wrong!!!
> >
> > Indeed, here underground where I have just partial shielding (at the
> ceiling) LaVita really behaved much better than aluminum plates (I had had
> to remove them some years ago)...
> > But encouraged by that success of some months ago, meanwhile I made a
> complete room at another place... It is difficult to explain the night(mare)
> spent in there! I spent another night with the same result - it could be
> compared only to some psychoactive drug intake... Would I prefer to sleep
> near a mobile phone mast or there in the cage - a very difficult choice!
> >
> > So I searched the net and consulted some people including Andrew from
> this Group - to find out the amazing uniformity in findings... Dr. Gruen who
> participated at this Group also has similar observations, the following is
> an excerpt from the site that sells his Bioprotect(www.golden-ray.com):
> >
> > ..."If one takes a water sample and puts it into a Faraday cage – for
> example, a small bottle filled with water and completely wrapped in with
> some aluminum foil – and exposes it to the radiation of a mobile phone or
> some or other source of electromagnetic smog, then this water will
> significantly change its bioenergetical quality. In fact, it will change its
> quality much more than without the Faraday cage"...
> >
> > All that has both practical and theoretical implications. Regarding
> practical, Marc and many of you would agree that the solution is not in
> measuring and mitigating fields, but in "less conventional" means...
> > But theory concerns me as well... So I assembled this call below and I am
> starting by forwarding it to this Group. I would appreciate any responses!
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Drasko
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > There is a rather widely accepted opinion that Electrosensitive people
> don't tolerate conductive plate shieldings, of a Faraday cage type.
> Moreover, consent regarding that is more present than regarding toleration
> against different radiation sources.
> >
> > Such a statement is apparently an absurd as Electrosensitivity should
> have been sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, and the fields are at least
> partially mitigated by Faraday cages. (Practically, cage nullifies electric,
> radio and microwave radiation, while magnetic aspect isn't screened but at
> most cases magnetic readings keep within limits that are considered
> "usual".)
> >
> > Currently we are attempting to collect a work group of researchers and
> Electrosensitive persons interested in clarification of the issue, whatever
> the outcome they are advocating might have been.
> >
> > We would appreciate your participation. Please contact Drasko Cvijovic at
> cvijovic@... would you be interested in preliminary consultations.
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> >
>
>  
>