Posted by
emraware on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Traveller-s-protection-from-Pulsing-Microwaves-with-Naturell-tp1554645p1554711.html
Hi John,
> Zell is not much more expensive, but has a much more impressive
performance claim:
I picked Tulle b/c it is a little transparent so I can put it over my
head. It is also soft so I can make a vest out of it to wear as a
hidden, middle layer (although it's somewhat too thin so it was hard for
the person who helped me sew the vest). It's coated with silver which
I think should be relatively safe. The following looks similar to
Tulle:
http://www.next-up.org/images/Protection_voile_Antennes_Relais_09_06_200\
9.jpg
I have the Shieldex sampler set which includes Zell. Zell has a
tin-coating on one side. I'm not sure if tin is safe to touch? If you
bend it, it's more susceptible to creasing. It is not transparent and
not as flexible/soft as Tulle, so it couldn't be used for regular
clothes. However, I suppose you could use it for making a tent... or
maybe as wallpaper, although I'm using some cheaper static-shielding
roll for my wall.
> Thanks for clarifying the 8Ghz basic rf meter. It looks very good,
though
> still it goes down to only .02 V/m (20 mV/m); which is indeed more
sensitive
> than MW1 (standard), but my MW1 patched with thick silver foil is very
much
> more sensitive than standard and probably does go down to the 0.01
0.02
> V/m claimed.
The Basic RF meter (to 3 GHz) seems up to 10 times more sensitive than
the 8GHz basic rf meter in some instances. However, it's meant for a
smaller frequency range (to 3 GHz instead of 8 GHz).
> Does anyone know of more sensitive meters around (and not hugely
expensive -
> $499 for 8Ghz RF is about limit!)
If you want a more expensive professional meter, someone has shared this
link before:
http://microondes.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/hf-meter-comparison-en-1.p\
df
> I was suffering from a false sense of security at NOT being able to
detect
> these lower levels with my patched MW1, and so am still keen to be
able to
> measure them.
BTW, is the MW1 the same thing as the electrosmog detector, i.e., only
sound-based? I noticed that the electrosmog detector minimizes some
signals. For example, it makes DECT sound really strong, but in
contrast, a 900 MHz analog phone during a call, and Wi-Fi can sound
pretty silent on it, even though they're also pretty strong. I was
wondering why I felt slightly dizzy after testing 900 MHz analog phone,
when the electrosmog barely picked it up... until I bought the 8 GHz
Basic RF Meter. It's misleading if you rely on volume alone to estimate
the level of radiation. Hence, I prefer the numbers of the 8GHz Basic
RF Meter or Basic RF Meter. The sound pattern of electrosmog I use
mainly to determine the type of signal (wi-fi vs. cell tower vs. DECT),
but not to estimate power density.
> I should add that our house is new and lined with aluminum foil back
cavity
> insulation this makes it like a microwave oven, so these low
intensity
> signals are bouncing around and almost certainly multiplying their
effect
> from all directions, but MW1 is one direction only (more or less) and
so may
> be missing out on these cumulative reflections, so the 8Ghz RF Meter
may
> well pick this up as it's 3-axis (`isotropic')
You want to be careful b/c these materials work by reflection, so you
want to be reflecting it away from you rather than towards you.
> When you say you still have to get out of the tent, do you mean that
so much
> gets through that it's too uncomfortable to stay in? If so, what
do you do
> then? Is it actually better out of the tent with all its reflections
going
> on inside?
What I meant is that I'm fine in the tent, but even the temporary
exposures in the room but outside the tent can affect me. So it's best
to get a room that's pretty low to begin with. :)
> I still find it incredible that we even have to have this
conversation! But
> thanks for your help again
It IS really a tragedy that we have to escape into cages...
Diane Schou wrote: "Exhibit 6 To be forced to live in a Faraday cage, a
shield from wireless communication that ¶people cannot turn off, is
inhumane. Exhibit 6-F But worse yet, deterioration of health, from
unnatural electromagnetic radiation is torture."
Apparently, many others have also taken these desperate protection
measures...
http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/ProtectionsEmfCem.phphttp://www.next-up.org/pdf/AFP_France_has_its_first_radiation_free_refug\
e_in_the_Drome_09_10_2009.pdf