Posted by emraware on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Traveller-s-protection-from-Pulsing-Microwaves-with-Naturell-tp1554645p1554703.html

Hi John,

The performance figures for the Tulle cloth are at:
http://www.shieldextrading.net/woven_fabrics.htm
For some reason, they separate it from the actual store website.

The Cornet meter on less emf, is actually called 8 GHZ BASIC RF METER
http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html. The Basic RF meter is also nice, but
for a smaller range of frequencies (up to 3 GHz). I wouldn't recommend
these for professional use, but it's pretty good for personal use, to
get a pretty good idea of your exposure. It's very sensitive-- even
when the electrosmog detector gives silent white noise, I can
distinguish between differing levels.

Mast transmissions go through both wooden walls and windows without
reflective coating/window film-- some materials shield better than
others.

It depends-- in some situations, it's sufficient to put on the curtains
(one direction). In other situations (microwave on all directions),
then something like a Faraday cage is better. With the meter, you can
test to see what works. Yes, DECT in the neighboring room would still
be considered "near". I try to avoid DECT as much as possible. Nearby
sources can dominate over external sources b/c of their proximity. If
the cell tower radiation is too high, the cloth may not be enough-- I
usually choose a room on a lower floor if the cell tower is towards the
roof. On higher floors, it's more difficult because you still have to
get out of the tent...


--- In [hidden email], "John Jamieson" <john@...> wrote: (can't find
> a supplier over here).
>
> It's so helpful to have your feedback about resistance to DECT etc
from
> personal experience. There's nothing on the site (that I've
found) about
> actual performance figures, etc., which makes it very confusing/
uncertain.
>
>
>
> Do you feel that nearby mast transmissions simply don't go through
the walls
> then? I guess that depends on the walls and how near the mast is. Yes,
I
> think some form of self-supporting mosquito net arrangement might be
best as
> a) it's predictable to set up and b) it can completely surround
you. Do you
> think that it should be completely enclosed, faraday style? And would
you
> have the bottom of it under or on top of the mattress?
>
>
>
> AH, I get you're point about getting hot in a sleeping bag,
especially as I
> like very cool air at night!
>
>
>
> Interesting about waves `getting through' and then bouncing
around inside! I
> don't think I would be too near sources, but then what's too
near? If a DECT
> base is in the same house – say another room below, that seems
pretty near
> to me!
>
>
>
> Also, I agree about scouting the hotel if you can first, I do that
with my
> MW1 Electrosmog Detector to get to know least saturated areas, but
I'd love
> to have meter that really measures down to the levels I know already
affect
> me.
>
> There's to be a replacement for my MW1 (currently down to 0.02v/m
aprrox
> with foil patch) that's supposed to go down to 0.01v/m, but
I'm sure that
> even that's not enough and suspect ten times more sensitivity is
required –
> do you know a good meter that goes down to 0.001v/m (0.0025 µW/m2
??), plus
> up to 10Ghz, since they often go to less than 3Ghz, which I believe
would
> not pick up our WiMax networks now(?)
>
> I couldn't find a `Cornet' meter at lessemf :( - is that
very sensitive? Of
> emraware
> Sent: 25 June 2010 03:44
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Traveller's protection from Pulsing Microwaves
(with 60 transparent...
> The thermal qualities make it bearable both in summer and winter.
>
> ***Note the cloth is mainly helpful for low radiation (cordless
phones, meter
> to check the hotel's outside and inside. If not too bad, find the best
> floor using a meter like the Cornet meter (from lessemf.com), and use
it
> to give location preferences (e.g., lower floor) when checking in.
>
> --- In [hidden email] <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew
> McAfee amcafeerr@ wrote:
> >
> > I have found that having shielding fabric directly on my skin is not
a
> > good thing. The fabric is resonating with the radiation and is
> > conducted directly onto the body and burns (fries the 1st level of
the
> > aura).
> > I find having it farther away from the body is a better solution.
For
> > outside, a tent would be a better solution than a sleeping bag or
> > clothing.
> >
> > Now, I am traveling to CA on some F---ing planes and through some
F--- F--- of So protection
> > > right up
> > > to the 6Ghz plus range (unlike Bobinet, for instance)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So, I thought I could simply make a sheet sleeping bag with
Naturell
> > > sown
> > > around the outside and with some kind of hood for the head, and so
> > > protect
> > > myself at night in a hotel from the major part of the pulsing
> > > microwaves.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Further, it seems quite a soft material and I could make some
basic http://www.breathing-easy.net/rf-shielding-fabric/naturell-radio-frequen\
\
>
<http://www.breathing-easy.net/rf-shielding-fabric/naturell-radio-freque\
ncy-