Posted by
emraware on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/re-ES-Peripheral-Neuropathy-Thx-for-responses-tp1554600p1554681.html
Hi Lily,
Hmm, it's very interesting you found a big cell phone tower. I'm so
glad you were able to remediate it with special window film. That's
probably much worse than the power line magnetic fields. The following
video suggests that wireless radiation is worse than power line magnetic
fields:
http://www.magdahavas.com/2010/03/22/live-blood-cells-and-electrosmog/
In my research, I found that German students found a similar phenomenon
of clumping during cell phone use, and Bo Sernelius predicted cell
clumping based on math/physics modelling on van der Waals forces, which
are normally very weak, but increase dramatically in the presence of
microwaves.
Regarding power line magnetic fields, though, I would still aim for <
1mG for sleeping quarters, if possible.
The average level in houses in the UK, based on the PowerWatch Handbook
is 0.5 mG.
SBM 2008 (Standard of Building Biology Testing Methods) guidelines for
sleeping quarters recommends <1 mG.
No ConcernSlight ConcernSevere concernExtreme concern <0.2 mG 0.2 mG
to 1 mG 1 mG to 5 mG > 5 mG
The EPA once was considering 2mG as a recommendation.
However, some scientists like Robert Becker are more conservative and
suggest it should be <1 mG. (substandard sperm at 1.6 mG, De-Kun Li,
see microwavenews.com, and Chick embryonic development effects at 1 mG)
Recently, I learned more about a 3rd type of radiation which is dirty
electricity, intermediate frequencies on power lines. A study found
that even when the magnetic field was low, the dirty electricity could
still be high, and cause health effects. See:
http://www.electricalpollution.com/documents/MilhamMorganAmJIndMed2008.p\
df
Fortunately, the levels in my house are usually <200 on the
Graham-Stetzer meter, which is even considered high. However, in the
above document, some school had extremely high ratings > 1000.
> emraware: Sorry, don't know your name. The rating on the
> Trifield was 3mg or less. That's what is supposedly considered
> "tolerable", at least by mainstream, thick-skinned folks!
> Yeah, I don't even bother to use the microwave setting on the
> Trifield. I was renting a massage office that was probably a
> football field's length away from a very big cell phone tower.
> My Trifield microwave showed very low, but I had an
> environmental consultant come with his specialized microwave
> meter ($300++) with triangulated wires on top which was much
> more sensitive, and showed very high readings. We fixed it though,
> with transparent window foil (from Germany). Brought the readings
> right down to a safe level.
>
> Lily
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]