Re: towers vs. antennas
Posted by
lolahunt3 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/towers-vs-antennas-tp1554620p1554626.html
thank you, Stuart, very helpful
My RF Meter arrives in the mail Friday (I broke my first one, by accident, when it got smooshed in my backpack), but I'm going to see this place today...
Just heard that from Oct. to April the woodsmoke in that particular area isunbearable for those with MCS.
Rural has its complications, too.
-Sue
--- In
[hidden email], S Andreason <sandreas41@...> wrote:
>
> lolahunt3 wrote:
> > What is the difference between "towers" and "antennas"? What do I needto be looking for, to discern the radiation danger from .28 and .33 miles away?
> >
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> Sounds better than your current location.
> Still, it is no substitute for measuring the actual levels, on site.
>
> Towers are structures over 150 or 200 feet. They always have something
> on them active, for the owner must sell space (multiple antenna
> transmitters) to pay for the investment. So always avoid towers on the list.
>
> Antennas can mean anything. It could be very active for phones on a
> short structure or building, or very inactive like Railway and Logging.
> Look for the list of who owns the antenna, that will give an idea of the
> kind of use it gets.
>
> Stewart
>