Posted by
BiBrun on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Re-Can-anyone-tell-me-what-to-do-next-cell-phones-and-RF-tp1554258p1554320.html
You've got a carrier frequency and modulation on it that carries the
information.
There's some evidence that without the modulation, it would not cause as
many effects.
It makes sense if there is a rectifier. Then you'd be exposed to the
modulation frequencies as well as the carrier.
Becker's book Body Electric says bones are rectifiers, and I believe it...
though I don't know the frequency response. There are probably other
rectifiers in the body, and the question is, can they rectify at gigaHertz
frequencies.
With bones you can also get piezoelectric waves. One assumes then that
there would be resonant frequencies... I don't know in what range, but
different people would be sensitive to different ones. But with broadband,
every frequency over a wide range is used.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Latifah T <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Ian,
>
> I am not an engineer type, but I did take a weekend seminar with Dr. George
> Carlo
> (author of Cell Phones, The Invisible Danger, and founder of the Wireless
> Initiative,
> one of the world's leading radiofrequency experts) a few years ago. He
> elucidated
> the particulars about cell phone radiation. He said that it only even
> became
> understood about 5 years ago that although there are microwave signals that
> communicate between cell phone and cell tower, the important point is that
> conversations and text info and pictures are all conveyed on Information
> Carrying Radio Waves (ICRW's), and that those radio waves are the harmful
> frequencies. The ICRW's ride on the microwaves, so the microwaves are
> the carrier agent.
>
> If anyone has contrary or additional info about this, I would like to hear
> it.
>
> Lily
>
> Re: Can anyone tell me what do to next?
> Posted by: "Ian Kemp"
[hidden email]<ianandsue.kemp%40ukgateway.net>hyperman_42
> Mon Jun 7, 2010 3:50 pm (PDT)
>
> Thanks Mark for sharing your very interesting letter. I'd query one thing-
> when you refer to "radio waves", I believe the frequencies involved with
> cellphones etc are actually microwaves (can some of the electrical experts
> in the group confirm this?). It's important to distinguish, as radio waves
> usually don't harm anyone, even most ES people, but microwaves certainly
> affect ES people. They are both in the electromagnetic spectrum but radio
> waves have much longer wavelength, lower frequency and hence carry lower
> energy and do much less damage.
>
> Very interesting resulting discussion about the "9-10 pm" effect and
> adrenal
> fatigue. Again, lots of ES people seem to have the latter. The other
> possible explanation might be if cellphone use drops off sharply in the
> evening? (I'm just guessing here).
>
> Marc correctly reminds us that the vast majority of ES sufferers seem to
> have significant chemical sensitivities as well (usually linked to a
> compromised immune system). Is that also true of you Mark?
>
> Ian
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]