>
> Hi : ) I have the Ultrasone Headphones that have the maximum amount of EMF
> reduction (the Pro line) - there is a version that blocks about 70% and one
> that blocks about 97% (this is the Pro line). They are expensive, but for
> me worth it because I can use headphones again. Also they are really
> durable and I am very hard on material objects! And they fold up for
> carrying.
>
> The iCans were invented for use w/ mp3 players. Don't know how much emfs
> they shield, but if they are as good as the Pro Headphones, I wish I could
> afford to buy them because the downside to the pro headphones is they're not
> made for walking around- they're the size of stereo headphones- people would
> definitely look at you funny.
>
> They are the "real deal". They are primarily made for radio djs, and
> people in the music and film industry whose work requires them to wear
> headphones for hours and hours. I got them from a film company in Los
> Angeles. As noted, they are internally shielded with Mu metal- the only
> thing I am aware of that really does block emfs.
>
> I have a trifield meter and tested them and a pair of headphones belonging
> to my husband. The louder the sound coming out of any headphone, the higher
> the electric and the magnetic field will be. That said, the regular
> headphones had extremely high emfs- I remember the magnetic field was at
> least 100 milligauss. The Ultrasone was 0 milligauss, even if I turned the
> music up to the loudest it would go.
>
> Best,
>
> Taliesen W.
>
>
> On 3/20/10, torch369 <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> Just wondering if anyone has tried Ultrasone Headphones. Their claim to
>> fame is MU Shielding to cut the EMF Levels.
>> I tested my headphones with a CellSensor EMF Meter and the pads were a hot
>> zone.
>>
>>
>>
>
>