>
>
>
> I am glad there is some interest regarding the paradoxical effects of
> Faraday type shiledings!
> Bill, regarding the gadgets, of those that are popular, for example I find
> effective Bioprotect card (the author, Dr. Gruen, is a member here),
> Springlife Polarizer, etc... (I haven't tried too many of them!). But all
> they stop working after a while, if you wear them continually! In a Russian
> gadget manual it really says so: to use it 20 minutes with hours of pause...
> Many people agreed on the reality of that weird attribute... It is maybe not
> surprising in relation to recent research of brain responses to EMF, but
> there is no clear explanation...
> I agree that monitoring pollution through a simple amplitude modulation
> decoder (speaker) is useful! It matches the practical observations of many
> of us, and also suggestions from research that emphasize the importance of
> LF part of spectrum, and the signal pattern, while carrier amplitude seems
> to be less important. That downplays the widely spread (even among us)
> concept of "radiation", as the model for low level EMF influence. I myself
> suspect that the paradoxical effect of shielding has to do with this, as I
> have noticed that despites lowering the general "radiation", shielding
> "sharpens" the noise which you can hear out of such monitoring speaker, what
> is probably due to canceling relatively more of background noise than signal
> itself...Would you have any interesting, especially practical, notes
> regarding the issue, I would be happy to hear!
> Paul, can you be more specific how did you come to an idea they trap "other
> energies"?! I am considering any hint, as mainstream explanations don't
> work...
> Drasko
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>