Re: Aluminum cage worked!!!!!

Posted by charles-4 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Aluminum-cage-worked-tp1553672p1553763.html

Aluminium is a very peculiar material.

Because of its cristalline structure, it also shields the neccessary *cosmic
rays*, which we need for a living.

With all elektrosmog, there are the normal transversal waves, which we can
measure and shield ourselver from.
But also, there are the longitudinal waves, which are in the TeraHertz
region, and which do easily pass through a shielding.
And by passing through a shielding, their information can change abruptly,
from positive to negative or visa versa.

And, longitudinal waves do travel over a much greater distance than their
transversal waves.
So, when transversal waves are at their end, the longitudinal travel on and
on, so much farther.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton
.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Drasko Cvijovic" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:09 PM
Subject: [eSens] Re: Aluminum cage worked!!!!!



I am glad there is some interest regarding the paradoxical effects of
Faraday type shiledings!
Bill, regarding the gadgets, of those that are popular, for example I find
effective Bioprotect card (the author, Dr. Gruen, is a member here),
Springlife Polarizer, etc... (I haven't tried too many of them!). But all
they stop working after a while, if you wear them continually! In a Russian
gadget manual it really says so: to use it 20 minutes with hours of pause...
Many people agreed on the reality of that weird attribute... It is maybe not
surprising in relation to recent research of brain responses to EMF, but
there is no clear explanation...
I agree that monitoring pollution through a simple amplitude modulation
decoder (speaker) is useful! It matches the practical observations of many
of us, and also suggestions from research that emphasize the importance of
LF part of spectrum, and the signal pattern, while carrier amplitude seems
to be less important. That downplays the widely spread (even among us)
concept of "radiation", as the model for low level EMF influence. I myself
suspect that the paradoxical effect of shielding has to do with this, as I
have noticed that despites lowering the general "radiation", shielding
"sharpens" the noise which you can hear out of such monitoring speaker, what
is probably due to canceling relatively more of background noise than signal
itself...Would you have any interesting, especially practical, notes
regarding the issue, I would be happy to hear!
Paul, can you be more specific how did you come to an idea they trap "other
energies"?! I am considering any hint, as mainstream explanations don't
work...
Drasko




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links