Posted by Loni Rosser on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/abc-story-tp1553618.html


       I can't get the volume on this video anymore?????  What's up with that?  Loni








--- On Thu, 4/8/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Suing neighbor over wi-fi on ABC.com
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 2:53 AM


 





When ABC came to my home to film the sequence they arrived sceptical
about all elements of the story and left convinced that I had a real
health problem and that EMR was the trigger. I had picked one of the
biggest phone masts in London to demonstrate how bad the e-smog was at
any time and how effective the shielding was against bombardment by EMR.

The electrosmog detector provided the 'scientific proof'.

We can all generate coverage via significant media networks. Once the
ABC feature was transmitted in the USA several years ago I was
approached by other TV producers and magazine editors. ABC have now
used this footage again - this is important and indicates that they
believe the story. We need to write to them and explain how EMR
affects our own lives.

EMR and health is a massive story and to generate coverage we need
others prepared to invite journalists and producers into their lives.

Contact your local newsdesk and invite them to your own location and
show them how bad the readings are at your home or office and describe
your health challenges. Most of them are aware of this rumbling time
bomb and they need opportunities to film other worthy stories.

I am prepared to guide and advise you if you wish to approach your
local TV station.

best wishes

Sarah Dacre
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Williams <robert_connolly@ rogers.com>
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:29
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi on ABC.com

It was the video that accompanied the Arthurs story on ABC

http://abcnews. go.com/Technolog y/allergic- electronics- man-sues- neighbor- gadget/story? id=10240343

Play the video that goes with the story.

As you can see - ABC is not laughing at this story. They are informing
the public - producing videos like this is expensive.
Writing a story takes a few hours. Making a video takes about a weeks
worth of work.

NOW - EVERYONE ON THIS SITE SHOULD GO A POST A REPLY TO THAT STORY!!!!!!
When the editors see that there is so much response to it they will run
more stories about it.
IT"S REALLY TIME TO TELL THE WORLD YOUR STORY....

The cell phone activists did it - they brought it to everyones
attention. Now it's our turn.

On 2010-04-06, at 11:41 AM, Loni wrote:

> How can we see this ABC video?
>
> --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Robert Williams <robert_connolly@ rogers.com>
wrote:
>
> From: Robert Williams <robert_connolly@ rogers.com>
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi on ABC.com
> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 7:44 AM
>
> WiMAX falls into a different category then cell towers - there are
all sorts of cities and libraries and schools that have stopped city
wide wimax and local wimax.
>
> Think of someone with a peanut allergy - if you get onto a plane and
someone says they have a peanut allergy - they tell everyone on the
plane to refrain from eating anything that has peanuts - Same with
schools.
>
> Did everyone look at the ABC video of the woman that was EHS? The
program went to great lengths to inform the audience that the WIFI was
really bad. They stepped accross a big line.
>
> First it was cell phones - a senate hearing and then warnings - even
the FCC changed their RF page about cell phones to warn people. Now
they are moving onto WIFI - and cell towers. They are using people
that are allergic to electricity as a means of showing the harm without
scientific studies because no one will allow them to be funded.
>
> Unless we speak up and complain - the press will have no one to come
to for a story. The autistic moms screamed about thimerisol in vaccines
and that made a very big impact with the H1N1 flu shots. No one trust
the WHO because of it.
>
> The doctor in the Video said that he is seeing 10 times the amount of
patients that are like this than 10 years ago. It's only going to get
more common and people will complain to the point that things will
change. They took the lead out of gas. The are taking down the coal
plants - they are replacing the lead pipes. Things do change but only
if you request the change and only if the doctors and the press and the
government is informed.
>
> Wifi is no different than mercury fillings or for vacinations. The
FDA denies the harmful effects but how many dentists use it now? How
many doctors said - Ah - I think we need vaccines without mercury. You
can run to the country to get well but you need to also warn the
country folks that it's comming to their town unless they stand up and
fight it.
>
> On 2010-04-06, at 9:32 AM, cocopollyphenol wrote:
>
> > I think if I were him and I owned the house, I'd adapt the house to
block wifi etc. As long as he was choosing to live in town, and not on
acreage somewhere, he was going to be in trouble sooner or later.
> >
> > I spent a week out at a farmhouse out in the country, with a few
low signals from neighbors who weren't all that close, and more
importantly, not a blanket of wimax and only a few cellphone towers. I
could sit in the parking lot across from a cellphone tower and feel
okay, it was an older one, without a zillion dishes on it.
> >
> > I felt relaxed. However, the farmhouse had a mold problem that made
me sick as a dog.
> >
> > We came back into the Atlanta area and I began to feel ems
symptoms. I am sensitized more now since being in that house. I don't
know what was wrong with that house but I wonder if that wifi router
gave off extra strong signals, was somehow faulty. I also know it was a
strong router. That whole neighborhood was blanketed with wifi in every
single house, sometimes two to a house. In addition maybe that house
had faulty wiring or extra EMF. The odd thing is once sensitized I
haven't seemed to recover even tho it was only 3 weeks.
> >
> > Atlanta has been wimaxed and there are towers everywhere. As you
drive toward the city you see so many. Symptoms of spine pressure,
agitation (subtle), a weird alertness, and occasionally irregular
heartbeats now when I'm around strong wifi in a store...etc. It's very
unpleasant. I don't know what to do.
> >
> > I don't see any solution for anybody really, because wimax is going
everywhere. Give it another five years. Everybody will have even
stronger wifi routers.
> >
> > This just makes a good, "kooky" story but will not change policy.
If in 1996 they passed a law that no local govt could question ie
litigate placement of towers based on health, its a long upward battle.
They put their protection into place quite a while ago. Tell me how
we're going to change this. And most people are not sensitive or even
if they had mild symptoms wouldn't care. In addition, good studies
might require years--epidemiologi cal studies that look at rates of
illness/cancer around towers, and exactly how far. And it's complicated
now by wifi routers. I can't even imagine how you could design a good
human study. You'd just have to do animal studies.
> >
> > It took quite a long while for scientists to get bisphenol A on the
"bad" list. They did study after study with alarming results but the
industry just did their own sponsored studies. It was so profitable. It
took so much effort to target just ONE chemical.
> >
> > This is a way of life. If I were to move to that farmhouse if it
WASN'T moldy--who's to say in ten years it won't be wimaxed too? That
at some point the farmer next door will sell his land and a developer
will come in and a bunch of homes will go up with N-routers?
> >
> > I don't see a solution. In my case, I think I'm sensitized because
I have lyme disease which broke down my system, leading to MCS and now
ES. But I think the whole population is affected. For instance, they
now are finding that phthalate exposure affects boys' intelligence
(endocrine disrupter--estrogen mimic). There was also a great study a
while back that found that the level of phthalates in baby boy's urine
correlated with the distance from the anus to the scrotum--less
distance ie more feminized with higher levels of the endocrine
disrupters. No mother could notice that with her naked eye. But it was
a clear indication that effects were occurring. The same is probably
true of wimax, wifi (which I think are much worse than cellphones but
that's my subjective sense).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links










     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]