>
>
> Hi Bill - this is Svetaswan from the eSens Yahoo group. Right now, I'm
> strongly considering buying an Apple Mac Mini desktop - and from scanninga
> previous thread I realize that you mentioned that you used a Mac Mini. SoI
> thought I'd send you a private email asking you certain questions about it.
>
> From the information that Apple provides about this computer (such as the
> way it "smartly" adjusts its power based on the task it's performing, the
> little "wattage" it uses compared to other desktops, etc.), one would get
> the impression that it is a relatively good, tolerable computer for
> electrosensitives. From your experience, do you find this to be the case?Or
> does this computer bother you as much as (or more than) other
> desktops/laptops?
>
> I find the small size of this computer to be a big plus (even a necessity,
> given my limited space) - but I'm worried that there may be emr-related
> drawbacks to having such a compact desktop. I'm wondering if it may have
> some of the same "issues" that laptops are suspected of having - in that
> such a large amount of "technology" packed into a small space may mean that
> the system "skimps" on cooling/shielding - exposing us to more emr. Do you
> find that to be an issue - would larger desktops be more tolerable than a
> Mac Mini for this reason? Or does the Mac Mini compare favorably to larger,
> supposedly "better shielded" desktops?
>
> From looking over the info, it would seem that the Mac Mini's "efficiency"
> would make up for it's lack of size from an emr-standpoint - but you never
> know. People's real-life experiences may be different from the
> advertising...
>
> Right now, I'm planning to "upgrade" my CRT t.v. to an LCD t.v. and hook up
> the Mac Mini to the LCD t.v. - this is pretty much the only way I can
> efficiently fit a desktop into my bedroom. Hopefully I can tolerate an LCD
> t.v...
>
> If there is any other advice/insight you can give as far as making a Mac
> Mini as tolerable as possible, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks so much for
> your time and help (hopefully this email gets through to you).
>
> ~Svetaswan
>
> P.S. - thanks for taking the time to explain how metals act as both
> conducters and shielders (I think that was you). Due to some tough
> circumstances I'm dealing with - I didn't get a chance to acknowlege or
> respond to your careful explanation. But I read your post...I won't claimto
> totally understand it, but I read it. :)
>
>  
>