> From: svetaswan <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [eSens] Re: eSens - questions about Mac Mini
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 10:24 PM
>
>
> And I just wanted to ask - because this bothered me a
> bit....can someone explain how a message that I emailed
> privately to someone ended up on the messageboard, and
> distributed to everyone? 
>
> If this was done intentionally, I would have preferred that
> I be notified in private before it was done.  From a
> content standpoint, it may not seem to be that big of a deal
> whether this message is seen by one person or the entire
> group.  But from a courtesy standpoint - I wish I had
> been better informed of the situation and were given more of
> a choice as to whether I wanted to re-tailor the message to
> the entire group, or scrap it altogether.
>
> ~Svetaswan
>
> --- In [hidden email],
> "svetaswan" <svetaswan@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bill - this is Svetaswan from the eSens Yahoo
> group.  Right now, I'm strongly considering buying an
> Apple Mac Mini desktop - and from scanning a previous thread
> I realize that you mentioned that you used a Mac Mini. 
> So I thought I'd send you a private email asking you certain
> questions about it.
> >
> > From the information that Apple provides about this
> computer (such as the way it "smartly" adjusts its power
> based on the task it's performing, the little "wattage" it
> uses compared to other desktops, etc.), one would get the
> impression that it is a relatively good, tolerable computer
> for electrosensitives.  From your experience, do you
> find this to be the case?  Or does this computer bother
> you as much as (or more than) other desktops/laptops?
> >
> > I find the small size of this computer to be a big
> plus (even a necessity, given my limited space) - but I'm
> worried that there may be emr-related drawbacks to having
> such a compact desktop. I'm wondering if it may have some of
> the same "issues" that laptops are suspected of having - in
> that such a large amount of "technology" packed into a small
> space may mean that the system "skimps" on cooling/shielding
> - exposing us to more emr.  Do you find that to be an
> issue - would larger desktops be more tolerable than a Mac
> Mini for this reason?  Or does the Mac Mini compare
> favorably to larger, supposedly "better shielded" desktops?
> >
> > From looking over the info, it would seem that the Mac
> Mini's "efficiency" would make up for it's lack of size from
> an emr-standpoint - but you never know.  People's
> real-life experiences may be different from the
> advertising...
> >
> > Right now, I'm planning to "upgrade" my CRT t.v. to an
> LCD t.v. and hook up the Mac Mini to the LCD t.v. - this is
> pretty much the only way I can efficiently fit a desktop
> into my bedroom.  Hopefully I can tolerate an LCD
> t.v...
> >
> > If there is any other advice/insight you can give as
> far as making a Mac Mini as tolerable as possible, I'd
> really appreciate it.  Thanks so much for your time and
> help (hopefully this email gets through to you).
> >
> > ~Svetaswan
> >
> >
> > P.S. - thanks for taking the time to explain how
> metals act as both conducters and shielders (I think that
> was you).  Due to some tough circumstances I'm dealing
> with - I didn't get a chance to acknowlege or respond to
> your careful explanation.  But I read your post...I
> won't claim to totally understand it, but I read it. :)
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     [hidden email]
>
>
>