>
> So which material (brand) do you recommend? Is LAVA the safest?
>
> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, snoshoe_2 <snoshoe_2@...> wrote:
>
> > From: snoshoe_2 <snoshoe_2@...>
> > Subject: [eSens] Re: Dental materials-Crowns, etc
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 11:09 AM
> > Here is something else to consider:
> > from  http://www.gdr.org/drrita.html 
> >
> > "Radiation in Dental Restorations
> >
> > If you are not alarmed by this data, you should at least be
> > informed as a dental patient what questions to ask when
> > dental restorations are suggested or recommended to you.
> >
> > None of this information may apply to you personally.
> > However, I suggest you read it. Accidents do happen and even
> > people with very healthy teeth may be forced to accept
> > dental restorations at some time in their lives. A popular
> > dental restoration material is porcelain. Be advised the
> > color of this material may consist of radioactive cobalt,
> > uranium or thorium minerals.
> >
> > Safer restoration material is acrylic denture material.
> >
> > Some dental restoration material is gold. In recent years,
> > recycled gold from the space program electrical components
> > has been converted into restoration material. Gold is a
> > communicator in the body electrical system. The body does
> > not require radioactive gold, pure medicinal purpose gold is
> > safer to be placed into the mouth. Keep in mind, any dental
> > restoration material is in place 24 hours a day. If this
> > material is not compatible with the human vibratory energy
> > rate, it will become a health hazard putting the immune
> > system at risk."
> >
> > ~ Snoshoe
> >