Re: Faraday cage

Posted by charles-4 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Faraday-cage-tp1552023p1552030.html

Hello Drasko,

the problem is, that we do have three sorts of waves:

- the normal transversal waves, we can measure and shield against

- the longitudinal waves, which do pass shieldings, and may change their
information

- the cosmic rays, which are in the TeraHertz region, and com from both the
sun and earth.

The artificial waves do interfere with the cosmic rays, which we need for
living.
The longitudinal waves are also in the Terahertz region, and may also
interfere with the cosmic rays.

The BioProtect card *absorbs* longitudinal waves and normalizes the cosmic
rays.

Aluminium is a material, rhat blocks transversal waves, but also the cosmic
rays.

A gizmo is nice, but it is much better to improve the immuun system.
So, first bring your own body in order, and a gizmo can take care of the
last 10 % of your sensitivity.
Not the other way around.

Be alaso aware, that *dirty air* is te most pestering element in the whole
elektrosmog family.
Where electrical fields are hardly measurable, those VLF waves reach much
farther, biologically, over greater distances, than theoretically thought.
Of course, this goes only for electrosensitives.

We do have here two problems:

- the waves pass a far greater distance in their biologically property
- the electrosensitives may have longer *antennas* in their body to pick
them up earlier.

One can see this also, that electrosensitives do have different antennas. I
mean for different elektrosmog sources different antennas.
These antennas may be of a telescopic type, and change in length every day,
so the sensibility may change for different sources.
*Normal* people do not have those antennas.

An example for this is Paul, UK, with the plasma TV of his neighbour.
I am not aware that Pual reacts to the fridge, or furnace or other
electrical appliances of this neighbour.
He mentions only the plasma TV.
He we may have *dirty power* as well as *dirty air*.
The dirty power may be stopped, when Paul places a Stetzer filter on the
plasma TV plug at the neighbour.
The antenna cables from TV distribution may also emit a lot of dirty air.
It may be a good idea to ground the outer mantle to a *CLEAN* ground.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton



----- Original Message -----
From: "Drasko" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 9:37 PM
Subject: [eSens] Faraday cage


Dear all,
Have I mentioned some months ago I was very happy with my LaVita gypsum
protection boards, and that they don't make a weird feeling known from metal
Faraday cages?! Well, I was wrong!!!

Indeed, here underground where I have just partial shielding (at the
ceiling) LaVita really behaved much better than aluminum plates (I had had
to remove them some years ago)...
But encouraged by that success of some months ago, meanwhile I made a
complete room at another place... It is difficult to explain the night(mare)
spent in there! I spent another night with the same result - it could be
compared only to some psychoactive drug intake... Would I prefer to sleep
near a mobile phone mast or there in the cage - a very difficult choice!

So I searched the net and consulted some people including Andrew from this
Group - to find out the amazing uniformity in findings... Dr. Gruen who
participated at this Group also has similar observations, the following is
an excerpt from the site that sells his Bioprotect(www.golden-ray.com):

..."If one takes a water sample and puts it into a Faraday cage - for
example, a small bottle filled with water and completely wrapped in with
some aluminum foil - and exposes it to the radiation of a mobile phone or
some or other source of electromagnetic smog, then this water will
significantly change its bioenergetical quality. In fact, it will change its
quality much more than without the Faraday cage"...

All that has both practical and theoretical implications. Regarding
practical, Marc and many of you would agree that the solution is not in
measuring and mitigating fields, but in "less conventional" means...
But theory concerns me as well... So I assembled this call below and I am
starting by forwarding it to this Group. I would appreciate any responses!
Best regards,

Drasko

-------------------------------
There is a rather widely accepted opinion that Electrosensitive people don't
tolerate conductive plate shieldings, of a Faraday cage type. Moreover,
consent regarding that is more present than regarding toleration against
different radiation sources.

Such a statement is apparently an absurd as Electrosensitivity should have
been sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, and the fields are at least
partially mitigated by Faraday cages. (Practically, cage nullifies electric,
radio and microwave radiation, while magnetic aspect isn't screened but at
most cases magnetic readings keep within limits that are considered
"usual".)

Currently we are attempting to collect a work group of researchers and
Electrosensitive persons interested in clarification of the issue, whatever
the outcome they are advocating might have been.

We would appreciate your participation. Please contact Drasko Cvijovic at
[hidden email] would you be interested in preliminary consultations.

----------------------------------




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links