Posted by K on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Faraday-cage-tp1552023p1552027.html

I sleep under the heavy duty faraday canopy from lessemf.com I haven't slept that good in years. It also protects me from the RADAR from the military jets flying above in their practice runs ~ recovery time from the tremorsis minutes not hours. Huge effect for me.




________________________________
From: Drasko <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sat, February 13, 2010 2:37:08 PM
Subject: [eSens] Faraday cage

Dear all,
Have I mentioned some months ago I was very happy with my LaVita gypsum protection boards, and that they don't make a weird feeling known from metal Faraday cages?! Well, I was wrong!!!

Indeed, here underground where I have just partial shielding (at the ceiling) LaVita really behaved much better than aluminum plates (I had had to remove them some years ago)...
But encouraged by that success of some months ago, meanwhile I made a complete room at another place... It is difficult to explain the night(mare) spent in there! I spent another night with the same result - it could be compared only to some psychoactive drug intake... Would I prefer to sleep near amobile phone mast or there in the cage - a very difficult choice!

So I searched the net and consulted some people including Andrew from this Group - to find out the amazing uniformity in findings... Dr. Gruen who participated at this Group also has similar observations, the following is an excerpt from the site that sells his Bioprotect(www.golden-ray.com):

..."If one takes a water sample and puts it into a Faraday cage – for example, a small bottle filled with water and completely wrapped in withsome aluminum foil – and exposes it to the radiation of a mobile phone or some or other source of electromagnetic smog, then this water will significantly change its bioenergetical quality. In fact, it will change its quality much more than without the Faraday cage"...

All that has both practical and theoretical implications. Regarding practical, Marc and many of you would agree that the solution is not in measuring and mitigating fields, but in "less conventional" means...
But theory concerns me as well... So I assembled this call below and I am starting by forwarding it to this Group. I would appreciate any responses!
Best regards,

Drasko

-------------------------------
There is a rather widely accepted opinion that Electrosensitive people don't tolerate conductive plate shieldings, of a Faraday cage type. Moreover, consent regarding that is more present than regarding toleration against different radiation sources.

Such a statement is apparently an absurd as Electrosensitivity should have been sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, and the fields are at least partially mitigated by Faraday cages. (Practically, cage nullifies electric, radio and microwave radiation, while magnetic aspect isn't screened but at most cases magnetic readings keep within limits that are considered "usual".)

Currently we are attempting to collect a work group of researchers and Electrosensitive persons interested in clarification of the issue, whatever theoutcome they are advocating might have been.

We would appreciate your participation. Please contact Drasko Cvijovic at [hidden email] would you be interested in preliminary consultations.

----------------------------------




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links




     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]