Posted by alstrup on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/I-read-something-in-the-Links-area-tp1551768p1551798.html

So what is it that Clarus keep making their devices better with? Did anyoneever explain their technology effects in non-pseudo terms? When I tested the QLink in the late 90´s, I borrowed it from a friend who had worn itfor periods, I had some side effects from using it, felt like a field was superimposed on me and it felt like it was pushing a frequency. I did feelsome neutralizing effects of incoming ELF/EMF, but the overall experience was too weird. I was later told that the QLink will adapt to the natural frequency of the person wearing it and you should not share it with others. Iseem to remember there was a method given to clear a pendant, but that wasafter I returned it. True or false? There was some claim at the same time that there was a common research and development behind the Clarus and Quantum Products, but the person behind Clarus went their own ways and took the intermediate products to the market, true or false, anyone has the
scoop on this? Back then, no names were disclosed of who were behind theseproducts, now we find them on youtube videos etc.




________________________________
From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41
Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink!

 
> Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose.

I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying
around in my garage... :-)

I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did
virtually nothing for me.

Marc

 


     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]