Re: GEORGE CARLO'S ES TREATMENT PROTOCOL

Posted by Steph Smith on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/GEORGE-CARLO-S-ES-TREATMENT-PROTOCOL-tp1550095p1550134.html

Hi Sandra
 
In the article I read which I will try to post a link to, Carlo agrees thatif all we were to do was to go to somewhere where there is no EMF and our symptoms seem to abate while it might give us respite while we are there - unless we do more and actually try to treat the breakdown in cellular communication and try to restore what should be proper cellular communication [via the protocol he recommends] then when we return to a normal EMF laden environment the symptoms will come back. This would mena that to have any quality of life we would have to find an environment where we don't experienceES and then would be confined to it - what he proposes is to try to treat the ES so that we are relatively unaffected by the EMF. I have also just read something similar on Joseph Mercola's website which I will try to post to this forum because it explains it very well.I'm not trying to be controversial or critical of what other people are trying - I am as
desperate for something effective as the next person and am merely postingwhat I have come across to see what other people think.
 
Regards
 
Steph
 


--- On Sat, 15/8/09, S.T. <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: S.T. <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] GEORGE CARLO'S ES TREATMENT PROTOCOL
To: [hidden email]
Date: Saturday, 15 August, 2009, 1:25 AM


 



Exactly Loni, I am aware that my symptoms disappear immediately when camping far in the woods or on holidays in less RF infested places. 
 
I do not want dismiss his treatment but lets say we do this successfully elsewhere, away from our current situations. Is he saying that whenwe come to our "real life" we should  be cured and not feelsick? If he is simply saying, stay away from EMF forever and help yourself to undo the damage done while you were exposed, he does not really understand this issue. 
 
Sandra

--- On Fri, 8/14/09, angela england <mariaaengland@ yahoo.com> wrote:

From: angela england <mariaaengland@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [eSens] GEORGE CARLO'S ES TREATMENT PROTOCOL
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Received: Friday, August 14, 2009, 9:07 AM

 

Bravo, Loni.  You cut to the heart of the matter.  If we could eliminate emf, we could all heal.  I read about the area of Dolan Springs, Az. as being the ideal place, since it is far from large cities and in adelta area, which for some reason also helps.  Has anyone experiencedideal areas across these United States?
Mike in Phoenix
 
P.S.  Phoenix is not one of them!

--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: Loni <loni326@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: [eSens] GEORGE CARLO'S ES TREATMENT PROTOCOL
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 8:10 AM

 

Well, that is all good but how do you keep yourself free from EMR? If we could do that we could heal on our own. In this present day it seems unrealistic. Loni

--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Stephanie Smith <reader41@ymail. com> wrote:

From: Stephanie Smith <reader41@ymail. com>
Subject: [eSens] GEORGE CARLO'S ES TREATMENT PROTOCOL
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 7:38 AM

 

Hi everyone

I came across this by accident the other night. George Carlo was speaking in London to a group of ES people about what ES is, how to diagnose it, whatcauses it and how it can be treated. Set out below is the treatment protocol he says he is using and working on. It seems to me that if someone like him is this specific, that if it is a cellular communications problem [in anutshell how described it] and you have to go through these stages, and inthis order, to go about fixing it then if we want to treat our ES then isn't this the way we should go about it? I just wish he was a bit clearer on what some of the stages involve. I later came across a paper by Andrew Goldsworthy, also on calcium ion channels and his work echoed Dr Carlo's theoryof the cellular communication problem

THis is the protcol Dr Carlo described. I'd be interested to know what anyone thinks about it and how we could put together a DIY version if possible for those who can't afford to visit various practicioners for assistance with doing it.

West wishes

Steph

Dr Carlo stressed the importance of the patient remaining in an EMR free environment at all times during treatment, and that only the treatments listed should be used, and the sequence adhered to. Other supplements would be counterproductive, he explained, because the ion-channels needed to be kept clear to allow cellular detoxing. Average time scales are given for each part of the treatment, and regular checks and tests determine when a patient is ready to move to the next stage.

1. Neurological re-balancing
(weeks 1 – 3)
The aim is to stabilise DHEA and cortisol (hormones produced by the adrenalglands and considered to be markers of systemic stress). Treatments in this phase include yoga, massage, meditation, and therapies such as Network Spinal Analysis to calm and balance the central nervous system. During this phase the patient stops taking all supplements.

2. Ion-channel opening (weeks 2 – 6)
A form of supplemental magnesium chelated with amino acids is given to energise the mitochondria and encourage the ion-channels to re-open.

3. Mitochondrial enhancement (weeks 3 – 6)
Mitochondrial function needs to be enhanced at this stage or more toxins will enter the cells through the newly opened ion-channels.

4. Interstitial cleansing (weeks 6 – 8)
Once the ion-channels are open and the mitochondria are healthy, then the toxins in the interstitial space can be cleared.

5. Intracellular detoxification (weeks 8 – 12)
Now it is safe to allow the release of toxins from within the cells.

6 Cell membrane re-building (months 3 – 18)
Symptoms will have subsided by this point, but an extended period of repairis necessary to re-build cell membranes, using supplements and nutrition, and keeping the patient free from EMR.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]