>
> I do not know if the Introspect Oberon machine is the same as the "Oberon"
> diagnostic machine, but I suspect that it is. If so I should warn everyone
> considering using it that the Oberon actually triggered my wife Sue's
> electrosensitivity in 2004. We had never heard of ES before this, we went
> to a practitioner who used it to diagnose metabolic problems (it flagged up
> liver and pancreas as having severe problems - the former certainly correct,
> see some of my previous posts). However the machine transmitted a 3 GHz
> signal (microwave frequency range) using earphones for about 10 minutes.
> About an hour after we left the clinic Sue said that she was getting rapidly
> increasing tinnitus, and it very soon became apparent that this was
> seriously aggravated by most types of electric and magnetic field and
> microwave signals (mobile phones etc). The problem rapidly got worse andwe
> have only made real progress in the last 2-3 years by tackling the
> underlying problems in her immune system (found by biochemical testing).
>  
> So my advice to anyone contemplating using an Oberon-type machine is, DON'T!
> Or at least be absolutely sure that it is working on different principlesto
> the one used on us. The practitioner told us that it had been developed in
> the Urals for use on Russian cosmonauts. Of course, by definition, they are
> extremely healthy people, and Russia has not been noted for taking great
> consideration of health and safety risks in its industries.  
>  
> Also at that time the information from websites about the operation of
> Oberon machines was very poor - the underlying science quoted was a mishmash
> of misused physics terms. This does not necessarily mean that the machine
> does not work, only that - as for some other ES "cures" - the marketing
> people have felt obliged to try to offer some kind of "scientific
> explanation" even if they don't really understand how the machine works :-)
>  
> Ian