https://www.es-forum.com/Healing-with-energy-medicine-books-suggestions-thoughts-tp1549007p1549052.html
Hey G.H.C. (geriatric hippie convert)...I mean, Diane...
I think I've heard of that book. Thank you, I may consider checking it out. I once saw a Bowen Technique practitioner who also did some sort of "energy" (or other subtle) work. She did what she said was a kind of assessment of my energy field using two rods - it appeared that she was dowsing *me*instead of the ground for water. According to her (and the odd wobble of rods), "some things are a little bit mixed up!" (to loosely quote her).
R.
>
> Hi, Rticle,
>
> I also am working (recent geriatric hippie convert that I am) on energy healing. I cannot say whether your books you have mentioned are good or not, since I have not read them. However, a month or 2 ago I mentioned a book on the subject ("Energy Medicine" by Donna Eden) which I highly recommend. It is not geared to spiritual issues like many such books (not that that is necessarily a bad thing), nor is it about one "energy system". It is an all inclusive book which covers meridians, chakras, radiant currents, the aura, the lymphatics, triple warmer.... (There are 9 energy systems discussed in all.) The author gives exercises--some you can do yourself and some need another person. These exercises run the gamut from detoxing your body thru lymphatic massage, unblocking meridians, correcting a reversed meridian (this happens often in people with CFS, according to the book), etc, etc, etc. It even has a section on preventing jet
> lag! It includes an entire chapter on emfs and es--some of the es exercises use a magnet and require another person (I have not done these, due to needing the other person), however, the exercises I have tried do seem to help. Many of the exercises in the other chapters seem to be helping me, as well (esp lymphatic massage and like exercises). The polarity exercises help me. (If you are reading, Laurena, these exercises might also help you--the possibility exists that people who have our type of es have reversed polarity.) The book was not very expensive and I got it here:
http://www.innersource.net/innersource_catalog.htm>
> Diane
>
> --- On Thu, 4/9/09, rticleone <rticleone@...> wrote:
>
> From: rticleone <rticleone@...>
> Subject: [eSens] Healing with "energy medicine" - books, suggestions, thoughts?
> To:
[hidden email]
> Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 8:16 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Alright you bunch of hippies, listen up! (I joke, I joke; I'm only thinking of the recent hugging trees to ground yourself threads, which I try myself sometimes).
>
> It's obvious that all this EMR isn't exactly good for the body's own energy system. I think it can affect on subtle physical and even more subtle levels, and I'm willing to try whatever I can to be able to deal with it (even if I am escaping to somewhere less saturated), including working with my own subtle but important energy system.
>
> I've found a few books I like the sound of. Please, tell me what you think of them, any other ones, or what experience any of you have when it comesto this sort of thing. I think this will take a multifaceted approach.
>
>
http://www.amazon. com/Hands- Light-Healing- Through-Energy/ dp/0553345397/ ref=sr_1_ 1?ie=UTF8& s=books&qid= 1233880749& sr=1-1
>
>
http://www.amazon. com/Energetic- Anatomy-Illustra ted-Understandin g-Energy/ dp/0974927104/ ref=sr_1_ 1?ie=UTF8& s=books&qid= 1233880905& sr=1-1
>
>
http://www.amazon. com/Energy- Medicine- CFQ-Healing- Consciousness/ dp/059521939X/ ref=sr_1_ 33?ie=UTF8& s=books&qid= 1239244132& sr=8-33
>
> The only things about the first two I'm not sure about, based on reviews,is that "Hands Of Light" seems to use "channeling" as part of its methodology; I'm not sure about that.
>
> And one reviewer for "Energetic Anatomy" says he's improved his ability to see and *feel* energy. Hmm. I'm not sure I want to feel more energy, but I suppose it matters what kind we're talking about.
>
> Anyway, please let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks!
>
> R.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>