Posted by
evie15422 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Who-can-shield-a-laptop-really-really-well-tp1548943p1548995.html
Hmmm, interesting!
I wonder if that had something to do with the Dell product that had to be recalled a year or so ago? Do you remember that? (It is a very faintmemory to me. lol) A couple techs also complained a little about the R& D department. Said they sometimes put out products too quickly that should have more research behind them and a couple techs really hadblistering things to say about Microsoft--Microsoft doesn't share any access ahead of time with Dell techs, so that when their new products are released, the techs have no advanced knowledge of the problems and glitches in them. And they said that Dell couldn't make their computers compatible with Microsoft products because of lack of knowledge about the changes and updates, etc. (I got an earful!)
Diane
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, rticleone <
[hidden email]> wrote:
From: rticleone <
[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Re: Who can shield a laptop, really, really well?
To:
[hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 6:10 PM
I find this kind of understanding from industry insiders fascinating, dare I say even a bit heartening, in the midst of so much BS. Maybe they will pave a great deal of the way for change, having first hand, corporate experience.
Oh - regarding Dell, someone told me recently to hold off on any new Dell products - they said the customer service recently went down the crapper, and now Mr. Dell, or whoever the head is, is trying to get the company back to its previously approved of state.
R.
--- In eSens@yahoogroups. com, Evie <evie15422@. ..> wrote:
>
> Hi, Marc,
>
> Yes, you are right, Marc--all the fixes were designed to lessen what I reported having problems with. The techs did know, however, that this was becoming an issue and told me so. They were very concerned, in most instances (I'd say of the 8 or so people I spoke to at least half of those expressed a personal concern--not that they reacted, but a concern that something was wrong and emfs were becoming too strong. One expressed to me concern due to fear of future personal reaction and loss of his job.) I was really not prepared for that outpouring of support, since I got nonecalling Toshiba tech support and a local company they outsourced to! (Tho I was gratefully happy to receive it!) It totally sold me on Dell products!
>
> A couple of the techs reported surfing ES forums for info to understand how to help people with es who call in, and one asked which es/mcs supportforums I liked. It was apparent talking to them that they had more thana casual acquaintance with the concepts of emf sensitivity. Again, I amguessing these are not the norm of Dell techs--these were techs which Dellsent me to specifically because I said up front I needed technical supportfor emf sensitivity. But, that says alot about Dell, too. I asked one of the techs how he became an "es expert" for Dell and he laughed and said that there is a list each tech fills out of specialized areas they are interested in learning and he just checked that box. I think they got perks of one kind or another depending on how many boxes they could check. It is then up to the tech to learn about es--Dell isn't teachingcourses in this (or at least they weren't 3 years ago.)
>
> Still a very good sign, I thought,
> Diane
> --- On Wed, 4/8/09, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:
>
> From: Marc Martin <marc@...>
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Who can shield a laptop, really, really well?
> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 4:44 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > When I first called in, I talked with a techie who sent me to a hardware
> > specialist who he said specialized in this type of problem. When I got
> > the new guy I asked if he was at all familiar with my es problem and to
> > my surprise he said that he helped a number of people in the past with it
> > and that he was seeing the problem come up more frequently.
>
> I'm impressed (and somewhat surprised) that Dell has technical support
> to help with ES, although it looks like the tweaks that were suggested
> were merely to reduce hard drive activity / energy usage / wireless
> radio usage.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]