Sounds like a plan... you should experiment and see how good it is at
picking up wi-fi. If it's not too good Kensington has a dedicated wi-fi
detector for around $20 I think.
will do better than the one you found. It just gives sounds, no numbers,
and would miss unmodulated signals (although that may not matter).
And doesn't measure 50 hz AC fields.
and doesn't emit horrible emfs of its own, it should be a good investment.
a week) before bringing indoors.
> Bill sorry to keep bothering you with this- i actually am wanting to
> get something that will give me a"good sanctuary" , so im debating
> getting this and a buzz stick to start off with, and evolve to
> something else down the line. what do you think?
>
> ada
>
>
> --- In
[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, "Bill Bruno"
> <wbruno@...> wrote:
> >
> > Have never heard of it. Seems interesting for the
> > price.<
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/EMF-RF-Radiation-Field-Strength-Power-> Meter-100MHz-3GHz_W0QQitemZ370097073697QQcmdZViewItem?
> hash=item370097073697&_trkparms=72%3A1301%7C39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%
> 3A12%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14>
>
> > Might not be sensitive
> > enough for finding a good sanctuary, but should be able to detect
> a lot of
> > cell masts.
> > There's a lot to be said for avoiding the really strong exposures,
> and this
> > should allow that.
> > Hopefully it will pick up Wi-Fi but in standby mode wi-fi is not
> easy to
> > detect
> > because the pulses are short--but if the peak function works it
> could be
> > great.
> >
> > Also note the magnetic field sensor is also not very sensitive...
> good
> > enough to
> > protect the general public and avoid bad exposure, but again not
> enough to
> > find
> > a good sanctuary. A $20 buzz stick is definitely more sensitive
> (but
> > doesn't give a number).
> > The Tri-Field with external probe is 500 times more sensitive.
> > If you buy it please report back.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:50 PM, ada iye
> <betty_starbuckle@...>wrote:
> >
> > > thinking of buying a meter off ebay.. has anyone heard of
> this..
> > >
> > > EMF RF LF Radiation AC Magnetic Field Power Gauss Meter
> > > it says it measures from 100 hz to 3 ghz, wondering if that
> will do the
> > > job , for cell masts , wifi, hotspots in the house, and
> microwaves.. and
> > > wiring in walls etc.
> > >
> > >
> > > ada
> > >
> > >
> > > When you are down to nothing ... God is up to something!
> > >
> > > "Although my Soul shall set in Darkness, I will raise in Perfect
> Light, I
> > > have Loved the Stars to Fondly to be Fearful of the Night."
> > >
> > > unknown
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 14/10/08, angela england
> <mariaaengland@...<mariaaengland%40yahoo.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: angela england <mariaaengland@... <mariaaengland%
> 40yahoo.com>>
> > > Subject: Re: [eSens] minerals
> > > To:
[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> <eSens%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
>
> > > Date: Tuesday, 14 October, 2008, 6:32 AM
> > >
> > > Marc-
> > > Red grape juice, preferably home made, was listed as a plant
> with deep
> > > roots that would reach the nutrients deep into the earth.--mike
> > >
> > > Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> wrote:
> > > > THE INTERNET TRAIL LED ME TO A
> > > > DISCUSSION OF NUTRIENTS COMING FROM DEEP DOWN IN THE SOIL.
> THESE ARE
> > > > MINERALS THAT HAVE BEEN LEACHED OUT OF TOPSOIL. MOLASSES, SEA
> SALT,
> > > > CLAY, AND GRAPE JUICE ALL HAVE THESE PROPERTIES. MY WIFE HAS
> BEEN ON
> > > > MAPLE SYRUP AND SEA SALT, WITH FANTASTIC RESULTS. NOW WE ARE
> GOING TO
> > > > TRY THE MOLASSES AND CLAY (BENTONITE).
> > >
> > > Yes, supplementing with mineral-rich foods/supplements certainly
> can be
> > > helpful. I find magnesium and iodine-rich items particularly
> helpful.
> > >
> > > I'm not suprised to see molasses or sea salt on your list, but
> where did
> > > you read that grape juice was rich in minerals?
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>