Posted by Loni Rosser on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Home-Biologists-Report-Need-Help-Direction-tp1546627p1546643.html

Ian & Sue,
 
Thanks for this info. That gives me some hope. I am getting a quote on doing tint on the windows. This tint is supposed to cut it down 99.5% is the claim.
 
Do you know anything about the tint?
 
My walls are wood frame with stucco. Must be some insulation in the walls too. I'd like to avoid the walls but think because of my sensitivy I'll haveto them also.
 
Ok, I will shield the windows. I can't do it quick enough. I am suffering so much here.
 
Loni
 

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Ian Kemp <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Ian Kemp <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [eSens] Home Biologists Report/Need Help & Direction
To: [hidden email]
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 12:43 AM






Further thoughts. In the UK we can get metal woven fabric, the same
material as the faraday canopy but for much lower prices. This was good for
hanging on the inside of the walls to give shielding. (We used the faraday
canopy for this as wel in the end - as Charles says, it may be of limited
use).

The biggest single gain comes from putting shielding netting over the
windows. The reason is that walls do tend to absorb and cut down the
microwave signal (as they contain water). British houses with thick brick
walls are good on this, US houses less so if they are only think wood
planking (though wood is a good absorber). But glass has no absorptive
power at all and lets the signal straight through. If you have an acoustic
meter and hold it by the wall and by a window, you should notice a big
difference! So shield the windows - like net curtains in appearance, but
metallised.

Best wishes, Ian and Sue

_____

From: eSens@yahoogroups. com [mailto:eSens@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Ian
Kemp
Sent: 25 June 2008 22:55
To: eSens@yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [eSens] Home Biologists Report/Need Help & Direction

Here's one idea that could help. We had radiation coming through the wall
from our neighbours' cordless phones, wifi etc. We took the shielding
canopy for the bed (where it didn't help us much) and hung it along the
wall. It worked well and cut down the signal to almost nothing - at a
fraction of the cost and hassle of shielding paints, metals etc. Worth a
go?

Getting a school to move antennas, and getting anyone to accept their
effects, could take months or years. Doubt whether you'd find a lawyer who
would take it on -except for a fat fee - don't go there :-(

Ian

_____

From: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens% 40yahoogroups. com> com
[mailto:eSens@ yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens% 40yahoogroups. com> com] On Behalf
Of Marc
Martin
Sent: 25 June 2008 22:40
To: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens% 40yahoogroups. com> com
Subject: Re: [eSens] Home Biologists Report/Need Help & Direction

> I thought it was emf but the reading was low. He tested the microwave
> radiation & it was sky high. I never knew. I have about 4 or 5 cell
> anntennas right out my back window at the high school my kids attend. It
> is what has been killing me in this house.

Are these cell towers all on the same side of the house? Perhaps you only
need to shield that one side of the house?

I take it that the Quantum Home did not help with this?

Marc

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 














     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]