> Hi, Amy,
>  
> Sorry the last reply got sent without anything in it! 
>  
> I am not totally sure all wired is better than wireless.  For me
> personally, I see a diffference between analog and digital signals. 
> This comes into play particularly with the tv sets now.  I see a
> difference with "high definition" tv programs playing on my analog tv
> too.  I think what the govt is trying to do is phase out
> analog transmittions altogether.  I now have an analog cordless
> phone--it doesn't bother me at all.  But I cannot go near my
> brother's digital phone in his home.  Same with tv, my analog
> set usually doesn't bother me, except when you go into the settings and
> get the"blue screen".  However, when a high def tv program comes
> on, I get headaches and dizzy.  (Followed by turning it off.) 
>  
> I was thinking I'd be ok with a cable connection with my
> analog/digital set tuned into analog once they do away with analog next
> year, but now I am wondering whether that will work either.  (Since I
> can still react to hi def programs with it set to analog.) 
>  
> So much of this is not known until you get into the situation and you just
> have to play around with fixes or get rid of particular things you can
> live without.  But do not assume a corded item is better, because you
> may be like me and react to digital frequencies.  You may need to
> experiment some with the electronics of friends to see what you can
> tolerate best.  But know that that can also change.  There are
> things I once tolerated well that have now become less tolerable.
>  
> Also, you mentioned about wi-max towers affecting the out-lying areas of
> the country.  That is true.  I live in a rural area and it can
> be bad in much of the mountainous areas.  But since you are house
> hunting....  If you can, try out either the highest points in your
> area, where no other mtn ranges are even close.  (They position most
> towers on mtn ranges and position them so the frequencies are somewhat
> pointed down, rather than out--at least that is my experience here. 
> So on mountains some ways away from towers can be quite peaceful,
> es-wise.)  OR, if you can find valleys where there are twists and
> turns in the topography--no long straight valley where a tower at either
> end would affect you--that can also sometimes work well as long as there
> are no towers above.  In a city setting, many buildings can also be
> shielding, but then you have to be concerned about what electronics the
> occupants are using.
>  
> Also there is this site, sent to us by another member here, which you
> can use to tell where towers are:
>  
> http://www.antennasearch.com/
>  
> Good luck,
> Diane
>  
>
>
> --- On Tue, 6/10/08, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Hello everyone-an introduction/Stewart
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008, 12:55 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for all the info you gave. That's one thing I can't see about
> moving
> to the middle of nowhere. Now they are planning these WIMAX towers, I
> don't
> see why it would even matter. And right now we have a cordless phone, but
> when
> we move I'm changing that. So would you all say that wireless devices are
> worse than nonwireless?
> Amy
>
> ************ **Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best
> 2008. (http://citysbest. aol.com?ncid= aolacg0005000000 0102)
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>