Posted by Ian Kemp on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Effective-shielding-for-mobile-phones-tp1544827p1544888.html

Thanks Sandy for the useful snippet of information:
(Many of our most
immune damaged children seem to be electrosensitive).

This ties in with a lot of the evidence accumulating in this and other
groups that immune system problems and related illnesses are often a trigger
to electrosensitivity (in adults as well). Conversely, treating the
underlying illnesses (when identified, which is often difficult) seems to
have helped reduce ES for many people in the group.
This might link to possible treatments to alleviate autism.
 
Ian

_____  

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Sandy and Tim
Sent: 21 August 2007 08:19
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [eSens] Re: Effective shielding for mobile phones?



Dear Bill and Emil,

Thanks for very useful replies. Would you mind if I copied your
replies amongst our "treating autism" friends/. (Many of our most
immune damaged children seem to be electrosensitive).

With thanks,
Sandy

--- In eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Bill Bruno"
<wbruno@...> wrote:
>
> I agree completely with Emil. Those little beads others sell are
probably
> a waste of money. If I had to hold a shield to my head, I would
certainly
> want
> a shield that covers the whole phone (and lessemf sells them). I'm
not
> sure about the relative merits of that kind of shield, versus
speaker phone
> mode, versus a wired head set (preferably with air tube). But I no
longer
> feel safe with a cell phone on within 10 feet of me. Even with a
perfect
> shield there is potential for reflections, plus damage to people
near you.
>
> Pagers that only receive should be considered. Also, there exist
(I think)
> infrared head sets, although the one I saw advertised was for car
use
> and not actually in stock.
>
> Bill
>
> On 8/20/07, Less EMF Inc <lessemf@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I would be very grateful if someone could point me in the
right
> > > direction about mobile phone shields. I'd like to understand how
> > > shields can be effective during normal call use. My confusion
is that
> > > shielding could attenuate signal strength which could cause the
phone radiation is
> > absorbed by the user's head. This radiation is not useful for the
> > communication. Ideally, the shield should shield this portion of
the
> > radiation, and still allow the balance of the signal to radiate
outward,
> > if
> > the phone is still to work.
> >
> > Now, notice this: if instead of encountering a nice absorbent
head and
> > being
> > "wasted", the radiation encounters a nice reflective shield
(between the
> > head and the phone), then you are not reducing the performance of
the
> > phone,
> > you are actually improving it.
> >
> > Notice further, if you shield the side of the phone away from the
head,


 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]