Posted by sheila wade on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Effective-shielding-for-mobile-phones-tp1544827p1544860.html

Bill,
   
Hi! so nice to hear someone that agrees w/me about CELLPHONES, I have been in search of for past 4 yrs+ after switching cellphones & somehow became VERY HYPERSENSITIVE first to the "Signal" of the phone (in which my Left Temple area becomes an antenna)
   
& I cant seem to get w/in 4 ft(estimation) w/out my heading "throbbing" in that same area! It has become harder each year-since EVERYONE has one &
   
conclusion has seemed w/my history of "mercury" fils, contact len solution, eating out alot of "canned food/drinks" esplly the first half of my 40 yrs I know there is METAL ACCUMULATION in my head & have looked detox, IV EDTA therapy, etc &
slowly getting done, since expensive & need to research since if "metal" as MRI shows on my LEFT side of head(doctors would not say what "bright white spots are"? is quite obvious they match my "bright white" mercury fils on my PANX xray??????
God Bless,
Sheila

Sandy and Tim <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear Bill and Emil,

Thanks for very useful replies. Would you mind if I copied your
replies amongst our "treating autism" friends/. (Many of our most
immune damaged children seem to be electrosensitive).

With thanks,
Sandy

--- In [hidden email], "Bill Bruno" <wbruno@...> wrote:
>
> I agree completely with Emil. Those little beads others sell are
probably
> a waste of money. If I had to hold a shield to my head, I would
certainly
> want
> a shield that covers the whole phone (and lessemf sells them). I'm
not
> sure about the relative merits of that kind of shield, versus
speaker phone
> mode, versus a wired head set (preferably with air tube). But I no
longer
> feel safe with a cell phone on within 10 feet of me. Even with a
perfect
> shield there is potential for reflections, plus damage to people
near you.
>
> Pagers that only receive should be considered. Also, there exist
(I think)
> infrared head sets, although the one I saw advertised was for car
use
> and not actually in stock.
>
> Bill
>
> On 8/20/07, Less EMF Inc <lessemf@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I would be very grateful if someone could point me in the
right
> > > direction about mobile phone shields. I'd like to understand how
> > > shields can be effective during normal call use. My confusion
is that
> > > shielding could attenuate signal strength which could cause the
phone radiation is
> > absorbed by the user's head. This radiation is not useful for the
> > communication. Ideally, the shield should shield this portion of
the
> > radiation, and still allow the balance of the signal to radiate
outward,
> > if
> > the phone is still to work.
> >
> > Now, notice this: if instead of encountering a nice absorbent
head and
> > being
> > "wasted", the radiation encounters a nice reflective shield
(between the
> > head and the phone), then you are not reducing the performance of
the
> > phone,
> > you are actually improving it.
> >
> > Notice further, if you shield the side of the phone away from the
head,


         

       
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]