Posted by Paul Coffman on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/An-Interesting-Letter-tp1543751p1543754.html

This passage:

I have found some schools and some countries are already removing WiFi
systems because of extremely high levels of complaints from teachers and
students about ill effects after their installation..

Is there any specific info on which schools have actually done this? Any
kind of major institution in the US actually taking this action would be
unprecedented, and a major step toward publicly identifying this issue, I
would really like to know exactly who has done this. Thanks.

On 3/27/07, Art Kab wrote:
>
> Dear Ms. Levitt,
>
> My son has been having serious ailments over the last 6 months
> including: Severe and constant headaches, leg pains, poor sleep, and
> even heart palpitations. Various specialists were at a loss as to why he
> had these conditions! The only thing that showed up in extensive
> bloodwork was a low IgA level. I did some research and figured out that
> it may be the WiFi Wireless Internet I installed in our home exactly 6
> months prior.
>
> So I quietly unhooked the system, and monitored my son so not to tell
> him of my changes. Sure enough, within hours his headache that he had
> without pause for 6 months went away. We're about 2 weeks from when I
> first disabled the WiFi system and my sons ENTIRE medical symptom list
> has complete cleared up! No longer does he complain of sore legs or
> headaches, which is a big relief to us.
>
> Most importantly, his blood panel showed that his IgA levels returned to
> normal. Upon investigation I found that EMF/EMR from Wireless Networks
> can lower Melatonin, which indirectly lowers IgA - there are studies
> that confirm this. IgA itself is responsible for fighting a VARIETY of
> illness. So we can say indirectly that EMF/EMR may be responsible for
> an extremely wide range of human ailments.
>
> I have found some schools and some countries are already removing WiFi
> systems because of extremely high levels of complaints from teachers and
> students about ill effects after their installation.. I believe this
> issue is vastly more dangerous than Cellular towers because of the
> highly concentrated continuous signal nature of wireless internet.
>
> I believe there needs to be some detailed and up to date works to
> reflect the rapid increase of high powered wireless internet networks
> being installed in schools, homes, and cities nationwide.
>
> Any opinions on this? Kind Regards,
>
> Robert McNaughton
>
> Dear Robert,
>
> Thanks for this email. I will pass it along to appropriate people in
> federal
> regulatory agencies who need to hear this exact kind of information. Just
> so
> you know, this is about the 10th such communication within the last year
> that I have gotten describing pretty much the same symptoms. WiFi is
> certainly a problem. When I lecture on cell towers, I now say that it
> never
> ceases to amaze me that people will fight a cell tower in their
> neighborhood, then throw in a WiFi system at home which is just like
> inviting a cell tower indoors. The problem with towers/infrastructure now
> is
> that they are using significantly higher frequencies due to the FCC
> licensing of broadband, i.e. telecom companies can now offer Internet
> access, TV, text messaging, music downloads, etc. etc. Yesterday's old
> analog cell tower that could cover a 10-15 mile radius morphed into
> digital
> PCS that could cover about a 3-mile radius, and now the "next generation"
> infrastructure requires antennas/towers every 1-2 miles. These are likely
> all unsafe technologies, it's just a question of degree and exposure
> parameters. But personal WiFi domestic systems are by far the worst right
> now due to it's very close proximity to people and the higher frequencies
> at
> which they operate. And of course whole cities are going WiFi.
> Unfortunately
> the learning curve on this is steep, there are literally NO research funds
> available in America, and the FCC, which controls for exposure standards,
> is
> a non-health agency. So everyone is learning about this one individual
> anatomy at a time, literally. Eventually the adage that the "plural of
> anecdote is data" will come to pass. But someone needs to collect the
> information and we don't even have that going on. No one wants to monitor
> this. Everyone just wants it to be fine. People who get into difficulties
> have no one to tell but a journalist like me. And most MDs are clueless.
> I am glad that you figured out your son's problems so quickly. That's
> unfortunately rare. Please let me know how he progresses.
>
> Best Regards,
> Blake Levitt
> P.S. I wrote about melatonin in my first book on this subject and there is
> another book called The Melatonin Hypothesis, edited by Stevens, Wilson
> &Anderson. That latter is mostly about powerline frequencies but it is
> full
> of good information.
>
> --
> Art Kab
> "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



--
Paul Coffman


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]