Re: ES and face burning rash

Posted by Ian Kemp on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/ES-and-face-burning-rash-tp1543425p1543433.html

This all sounds consistent. Ideally, one would find the underlying cause
and treat it, the trouble is that this seems to vary a lot between different
people. My wife Sue, for example, developed immune system problems after
heavy antibiotics treatment at age 39, having been previously healthy,
giving all the symptoms you report below, and finally (4 years later) ES. In
her case the basic problems seem to be "leaky gut syndrome", stress-related
cortisol, and faults in 2 specific liver detoxification mechanisms. With a
two-pronged attack of treating these problems and avoiding electrical fields
and chemicals, her condition has improved and she now "bounces back" faster
from any exposures.

Cellphones and computers are generally bad news for people who have become
ES, but if you can't avoid them in your job, Marc and lots of others in this
group have practical suggestions on devices for reducing the effects. Again,
though, different things work for different people.

ian

_____

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
wvucedtammy
Sent: 10 February 2007 19:02
To: [hidden email] Subject: [eSens] Re: ES and face burning rash



Yes, this is the first job I've had to use a cell phone. I didn't use
one at all before. My other symptoms are trouble sleeping, digestive
problems (doc ran tests and couldn't find anything wrong), fatige,
hives and other allergy symptems that I never had before. (I'm 41
years old and never had allergies as a child) I don't use a lot of
chemicals but when I'm in my office, the cleaning solutions they use
bother me. At home we use organic products as much as possible. My
immune system has seemed to take a beating over the last few years.

--- In eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Ian Kemp"
<ianandsue.kemp@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Tammy, unfortunately there aren't any tests yet to conclusively
determine
> ES, which is one of the reasons why "mainstream" medicine is so
sceptical.
> It would be great if someone could find one!
>
> However, your skin rash and other symptoms sound very like the
effects
> reported, particularly in Sweden, which first identified ES. The
general
> cause was high levels of exposure to computers/screens and mobile
(cell)
> phones.
>
> You mention "other health problems" - do these include ME, CFS or
MCS
> (multiple chemical sensitivity)? For many people, these are
precursors to
> developing ES. They are usually a sign of immune system problems
(lots of
> mails in the past in the group about this). Also, is this your
first job
> where you have used a cellphone for such long periods?
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com
[mailto:eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com] On
Behalf Of
> wvucedtammy
> Sent: 09 February 2007 21:20
> To: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com
> Subject: [eSens] ES and face burning rash
>
>
>
> For about a year and a half, I've had this rash on my face. I feel
a
> burning, skin crawling, itching sensation. Little white bumps show
up
> on my face when it's at it's worse. Now the part that has healed
looks
> like a sunburn. At times it's so bad I itch it till it bleeds. A
few
> months ago I took a few weeks off work and the rash almost
completly
> went away. I went back to work and it came back. Last month I was
in a
> hotel room, using my cell phone and happened to look in the mirror.
The
> rash is exactly where I hold my phone. I use a computer 4-6 hours a
day
> and a cell phone at least an hour per day, sometimes more often. So
I
> googled my symptoms and found ES information. I had never heard of
it
> before. I've also had a lot of other health problems that I never
had
> before I took this job. Now I'm noticing the same kind of stinging
on
> my chest when I've been at the computer for a long time. Is there
any

> testing that a doctor can do to determine if it is ES? Thanks for
> listening.
>
> Tammy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]