Posted by richsurf77 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Electrohypersensitivity-State-of-the-Art-of-a-Functional-Impairment-tp1543252p1543261.html


This is an interesting paper. I don't understand why mobile phones
and their masts are allowed to keep being used and put up when there
is so much evidence that they are not safe. If there is evidence that
5 or more years of regular use increases the chances of a brain
tumour, I'm amazed that so many people use them.


BTW I've posted part of an article below and I was wondering what is
causing his symptoms from the battery operated near infrared device.
Is it the frequency of the device? The reason I'm asking is because
i'm guessing a battery operated device would not have a magnetic
field and would not have a very powerful electric field. And it's
obviously not the light shining into his eyes that's causing it.


http://www.freewebs.com/eclectives/monitorpain.htm


Another clue which points to moderation as best solution (I.E.
dim/small/thin laptops) is that, in general, light radiation causes
various reactions. For example, in neonatal hospital wards, when
jaundiced preemies are placed under BLUE fluorescent lamps for
treatment, nurses in the vicinity get headaches and feel nauseous.
Update as of Aug.2006: I have just started experimenting with NEAR
INFRA-RED LED pocket-size massager. It operates on two AA batteries,
& it's potent at 60,000 mcd total, and 660 nanometers. Interestingly,
it causes my teeth to throb, as well as eye irritation & dryness,
despite that I shut my eyes tight & keep them covered with my arm.
So... what's my point? My point is: This is proof that LIGHT is the
culprit, rather than Alternating Current, Refresh Rates, etc.

(mcd is the measure of the total brightness of a light source)



--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a PDF of a new paper by Olle Johansson:
>
> http://ufoseries.com/es.pdf
>
> Marc
>