> Marc wrote:
> "I think Charles has already established credibility... You might
> get
> the answers you're looking for if you'd stop threatening people
> with lawsuits, which I think makes *you* lose credibility. "
>
> Shivani responds:
> Charles has been posting here for a long time, yes. And he usually
> has good information, yes.
> However, if he posts something that defames a product, he needs to offer
> substantiation. To spread false information about a product that causes
> uninformed people to have a negative view of that product is not only
> unethical, it
> certainly IS a legal matter.
>
> Dave's first reaction to what Charles said was very laid back. He
> thought Charles was just some misinformed person. However, as the
> conversation
> has developed, it appears that Charles has an agenda, as he has not
> reacted in
> a logical and reasonable way. If this were your product being falsely
> maligned, Marc, I am rather sure you would see this in a very different
> light. A
> court would.
>
> By the way, I am not about to sue anybody. It's not my product being
> maligned. I am the messenger here. Being shot at plenty.
>
> What Charles said was:
> "I have reports from the German company Bajog, who have calculated and
> tested, that raising the number of capacitors (filters) can cause
> unwanted resonances, by which other electrical equipment can get damaged.
> By raising the capacity of 200 uF and a net impedance of 0,5-1,2 Ohm
> (praxis value), the critical resonance frequency can be 180 Hz, which is
> the
> 3rd
> harmonic."
> He implies that this is somehow relevant to the Stetzer filters, but
> so
> far has not answered any of my questions about it. If Bajog in fact did a
> study on the Stetzer filters, let's see it. WHAT did Bajog test?
> Stetzer
> filters, or something else?
> As I pointed out before, there is no number of Stetzer filters the lab
> or anyone else could use that would = 200uF and cause resonance.
>
> As more people have found out about how damaging electrical pollution
> is, and how much the Stetzer filters can help, the electric utilities and
> their
> bosom buddies in governmental agencies are taking action to purposefully
> misinform the public regarding the filters. The recent publication by
> Health
> Canada is one of these projects. (By the way, since we have posted Dr.
> Havas'
> comments of rebuttal, the Health Canada publication is now unavailable at
> their
> Web site. They claim it is a technological problem.) Dave Stetzer and
> Dr.
> Martin Graham are presently looking into suing them for publishing this
> false
> information about the filters. Dave and Marty would rather spend their
> time
> working on new ways to help people, but are forced into this in order to
> protect their name and their product.
>
> It is the same here. If this is a simple misunderstanding, why
> didn't
> Charles just answer the questions that I asked? Instead, he just goes
> on
> and on badmouthing the Stetzer filters.
>
> Another group that continues to make inaccurate remarks about the
> Stetzer filters is baubiologists. Dave Stetzer and Dr. Graham have
> tried and
> tried to educate baubiologists regarding the importance of FREQUENCY over
> magnetic
> field strength, and to explain to them why their "body voltage"
> methodology
> is unsound. But the baubiologists, as a group, for some reason believe
> they
> understand electricity better than they actually do, and they continue to
> make
> harmful statements about the filters.
>
> (A Canadian baubiologist previously claimed that a reputable lab in
> Texas had done a test of the Stetzer filters that showed that are a fire
> hazard.
> When Dave asked for a copy, the fellow said "Oh, I was drunk when I said
> that. There wasn't actually any study.")
>
> Whether Charles' motivation is related to his being part of this group
> (baubiology), we do not know. I hope not.
>
> Personally, I am surprised., as I have had good personal
> e-conversations
> with Charles in the past, and had the feeling that his motivations were
> good.
> I repeat again that I have no personal animosity towards anyone on this
> list, but I will not remain silent in the face of misinformation being
> spread
> about the Stetzer products.
>
> At any rate, I once again request that Charles clarify his remarks
> about
> whatever it is that Bajog has studied and published.
>
> Regards,
> Shivani
> www.LifeEnergies.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>