Posted by SArjuna on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Dave-Stetzer-s-comments-re-filters-performance-tp1542880p1542927.html

Marc wrote:
"I think Charles has already established credibility... You might get
the answers you're looking for if you'd stop threatening people
with lawsuits, which I think makes *you* lose credibility. "

Shivani responds:
Charles has been posting here for a long time, yes. And he usually
has good information, yes.
However, if he posts something that defames a product, he needs to offer
substantiation. To spread false information about a product that causes
uninformed people to have a negative view of that product is not only unethical, it
certainly IS a legal matter.

Dave's first reaction to what Charles said was very laid back. He
thought Charles was just some misinformed person. However, as the conversation
has developed, it appears that Charles has an agenda, as he has not reacted in
a logical and reasonable way. If this were your product being falsely
maligned, Marc, I am rather sure you would see this in a very different light. A
court would.

By the way, I am not about to sue anybody. It's not my product being
maligned. I am the messenger here. Being shot at plenty.

What Charles said was:
"I have reports from the German company Bajog, who have calculated and
tested, that raising the number of capacitors (filters) can cause
unwanted resonances, by which other electrical equipment can get damaged.
By raising the capacity of 200 uF and a net impedance of 0,5-1,2 Ohm
(praxis value), the critical resonance frequency can be 180 Hz, which is the
3rd
harmonic."
He implies that this is somehow relevant to the Stetzer filters, but so
far has not answered any of my questions about it. If Bajog in fact did a
study on the Stetzer filters, let's see it. WHAT did Bajog test? Stetzer
filters, or something else?
As I pointed out before, there is no number of Stetzer filters the lab
or anyone else could use that would = 200uF and cause resonance.

As more people have found out about how damaging electrical pollution
is, and how much the Stetzer filters can help, the electric utilities and their
bosom buddies in governmental agencies are taking action to purposefully
misinform the public regarding the filters. The recent publication by Health
Canada is one of these projects. (By the way, since we have posted Dr. Havas'
comments of rebuttal, the Health Canada publication is now unavailable at their
Web site. They claim it is a technological problem.) Dave Stetzer and Dr.
Martin Graham are presently looking into suing them for publishing this false
information about the filters. Dave and Marty would rather spend their time
working on new ways to help people, but are forced into this in order to
protect their name and their product.

It is the same here. If this is a simple misunderstanding, why didn't
Charles just answer the questions that I asked? Instead, he just goes on
and on badmouthing the Stetzer filters.

Another group that continues to make inaccurate remarks about the
Stetzer filters is baubiologists. Dave Stetzer and Dr. Graham have tried and
tried to educate baubiologists regarding the importance of FREQUENCY over magnetic
field strength, and to explain to them why their "body voltage" methodology
is unsound. But the baubiologists, as a group, for some reason believe they
understand electricity better than they actually do, and they continue to make
harmful statements about the filters.

(A Canadian baubiologist previously claimed that a reputable lab in
Texas had done a test of the Stetzer filters that showed that are a fire hazard.
When Dave asked for a copy, the fellow said "Oh, I was drunk when I said
that. There wasn't actually any study.")

Whether Charles' motivation is related to his being part of this group
(baubiology), we do not know. I hope not.

Personally, I am surprised., as I have had good personal e-conversations
with Charles in the past, and had the feeling that his motivations were good.
I repeat again that I have no personal animosity towards anyone on this
list, but I will not remain silent in the face of misinformation being spread
about the Stetzer products.

At any rate, I once again request that Charles clarify his remarks about
whatever it is that Bajog has studied and published.

Regards,
Shivani
www.LifeEnergies.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]