Re:EMF/Chemicals

Posted by snoshoe_2 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Re-BioProtect-card-Quantum-Pro-and-Stetzer-tp1542558p1542627.html

Hi Charles,

Too low for many to perceive, not all, and who knows what the animals
perceive on that level. I'm sure a whole lot more than most of us.  
Right perspective yes, but just like the subtle diffeneces in the
strength of the batteries for fridge, vs. pc, that is subtle, and
most people don't you think will say that is imperceptible too?

~ Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:

>
> Hello Snoshoe,
>
> I am sorry, but you are unfair to Vinny.
> I agree with his remarks.
>
> But Elektrosmog is not Elektrosmog.
>
> You proved that yourself.
>
> The battery on you fridge works different than on the monitor.
>
> The reason is, that the fridge emits only electrical and magnetic
AC fileds
> of 50/60 Hz.
>
> The monitor however gives weaker electrical and weaker magnetic AC
fields,
> because they have to fullfil the TCO norms, bur they radiate high
> frequencies, mostly in the VLF range around 30 kHz.
> And those are harmfull for electrosensibles.
>
> So you perceived the difference between two different sorts of
elektrosmog.
>
> But again, I do know how EHS people may react to very low radiation
levels
> of elektrosmog, but the electronic levels of chemicals are too low
to
> perceive.
> Chemicals may give smells, and then we come to the chapter of MCS,
multiple
> chemical sensitivity.
>
> Satellites do emit also EMF, and their signals are much stronger
than those
> of chemicals, but hardly anybody *feels* them.
>
> One must look at this in the right perspective.