> Yes Christine,
>
> You are right, as I, Tayloka, and some others have covered this whole
> thing a few months back on here. Remember the cake batter?
>
> Radon is radioactive, and does have it's own emf, as does radium,
> fluorine, and everything else in existence.
>
> One person's grain of sand is another's elephant, or anaphylactic
> reaction. I wish everyone here would get that. If you're ES, YOU,
> have that elephant, that appears as a grain of sand to the majority
> of the world, so who is anyone here to keep poo-pooing others for the
> same thing?
>
> Everything is electric, if it wasn't, there'd be no life. A good
> book is "The Body Electric". Or how about just basic chemistry and
> physics, where they teach this stuff in high school now?
>
> Vinny, you can quit trying to impress yourself in front of everyone.
> There's many engineers, electrical, biological, healers, alternative
> practitioners on this site, so, I'm sure at least some of them, like
> myself are not impressed with your continual speels, cutting others
> down, and obvious desire to sell your products.
>
> That's a great test for the candida Charles. - I don't want the wheel
> reinvented, I just want to carry one wheel, instead of three. :)
>
> I tried a 6v flashlight battery on top of the fridge, and Wow! It was
> rather energizing for the 1st two days, so that I took it off at
> night the first time.
>
> It feels as though the coils on top cause the energy to go up and
> out. I didn't like it on the pc. It felt as though the energy wasn't
> being released high enough away, and was bothersome. I think again,
> because the coils were transforming the energy in a way the D's
> don't, which I stil have on my pc.
>
> The pascalite, like some other clays, absorb radiation, that's why
> some people find it beneficial to place in front of their pcs.
>
> ~ Snoshoe (I'm not the person, someone asked if I was another
> member, not sure which that was.)
>
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], Vinny Pinto <vinny@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christine:
>>
>> To answer briefly from my own perspective: yes, all of matter, and
>> even all of free space, and of course, all living systems, are
>> electromagnetic in nature, and yes, elements do have signatures if
>> tested in certain ways, but it still inaccurate to state that they
>> are significant emitters of EMF energies!
>>
>> with care,
>> --Vinny
>>
>> At 11:05 AM 10/12/2006, you wrote:
>> > > >Somewhere, sombody wrote:> >> EMF and chemicals are two
> different
>> >things, and do not have a
>> > > >> correlation.
>> >
>> >Chemicals do have frequency 'signatures' (see 'files' 23rd Annual
>> >International Symposium on Man & His Environment by Cyril Smith)
> which
>> >are "entrained by a person's endogenous frequency" given sufficient
>> >exposure. Smith states, "a chemical frequency signature locks up
> that
>> >particular frequency within the affected part of the living system
> and
>> >prevents normal fluctuations in response to the demands of
> metabolism
>> >or the environment at that frequency." Dr. William Rae also cites
> in
>> >medical studies frequent coincidence of chemical sensitivity with
> ES.
>> >So, yes, chemicals and EMF ARE two different things yet they have
> in
>> >common frequencies which may potentially be correlates. Either one
>> >triggering the other resulting in ES/ChemS.
>> >
>> >Accept my apology if I have taken the above statement out of
> context or
>> >am stating to you the known or obvious. - Christine
>> > > >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>