Posted by charles-4 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Re-Quantum-Products-devices-tp1542572p1542623.html

Hello Christine,

sorry, you did misunderstand me.
I am not a doctor or physician, nor am I a psychologist or psychiater
(Psycho).
Everybody must handle as he/she sees fit.
Do whater you like, visit a shrink, do meditation, or reiki or whatever does
help you.
Talk to others.

I only wanted to make this point among the many points and agents for
becoming electrosensible.

My point is, that the mind plays an important part in this.
No, I do not mean what the physicians say *it sits between your ears*.
I mean that a better working of the psyche may help.
*Positive* thinking may help.

A very good book in this is *the Field* bt Lynne McTaggart.
After reading it, my wife was able, after some trying, to make contact with
*the Field*.
She asked for help, and got the ideas for laying imaginary blankets over her
body.
These blankets are in several different colors for different ailments or
pain.
(Red, blue, green, etc.)
She found so, that an imaginary plastic blanket wrapped around her, helped
her with her EHS.

A MCS patient in Belgium had a whole group of other MCS patients around her.
I advised her about elektrosmog and other matters.
She read *the Field* and followed my advices.
She has abandoned this group, and can go shopping in the supermarket and all
other shops.
She does not panick anymore and is not bothered by the smells all around.

It may seem farfetched, but may I remind, that the human body is the most
complex machine available?

We do have magnetite in our brains, and that plays an important part with
electrosensibility.
Some *elektrosmog-protectors* contain magnetite.
In some ways our body works on magnetite, and I could imagine, that special
brain waves (by thinking) could have a positive effect on this magnetite.
Beware, it is only my thinking, but it may be an explanation.

The working mechanism of electromagnetic fields are for 90 % scientifically
found and explained.
It has to do with calcium and potasium ions in and around cells.
I quote:
*Ions can only pass through biol membranes via protein channels. That's why
our theory is focused on the interaction
between the ions and the channel sensors, resulting in irregular gating of
the channels. In this way it is explained why pulsed fields are more
bioactive than continuous ones, why low frequencies are more bioactive than
higher ones etc. It's all very clear and simple and showed by exact
mathematical calculations.*
And:
*Calcium plays an important part in many of these cascades and acts as a
kind of master gain control. Consequently, the entry of extra calcium into
the cytosol as a result of electromagnetic exposure tends to stimulate
whatever activity the cell in question is programmed to carry out. If it is
programmed to grow, growth may be stimulated, if it is programmed for
repair, healing may be stimulated, if it is a dormant precancerous cell,
tumour production may be stimulated.*

This comes from a discussion which still continues after *het bitje* October
2006.

For many years, I have seen women, who were quite normal, but found one day,
that their husband had affairs with others. This gave such a trauma, that
they got breast cancer.
The breast were operated, but six months later, we had to attend the
funeral.
We have observed that many times.
In Germany, they do not perform such operations.
But cancer is another chapter and off-topic.
I only want to show what traumas can do, and make people vulnerable.

Of course I try to measure as much as possible, but I have an opend mind for
other stuff.
And I dig a little deeper than others do.
I am no scientist, but I can combine very well.

In 20 years, we will all have a good laugh, when we look back at the
struggles of today.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus




----- Original Message -----
From: "eleccentric" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 06:03
Subject: [eSens] Re: Charles, no insult intended