Re:EMF/Chemicals

Posted by snoshoe_2 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Re-BioProtect-card-Quantum-Pro-and-Stetzer-tp1542558p1542613.html

Yes Christine,

You are right, as I, Tayloka, and some others have covered this whole
thing a few months back on here. Remember the cake batter?

Radon is radioactive, and does have it's own emf, as does radium,
fluorine, and everything else in existence.

One person's grain of sand is another's elephant, or anaphylactic
reaction. I wish everyone here would get that. If you're ES, YOU,
have that elephant, that appears as a grain of sand to the majority
of the world, so who is anyone here to keep poo-pooing others for the
same thing?

Everything is electric, if it wasn't, there'd be no life. A good
book is "The Body Electric". Or how about just basic chemistry and
physics, where they teach this stuff in high school now?

Vinny, you can quit trying to impress yourself in front of everyone.  
There's many engineers, electrical, biological, healers, alternative
practitioners on this site, so, I'm sure at least some of them, like
myself are not impressed with your continual speels, cutting others
down, and obvious desire to sell your products.

That's a great test for the candida Charles. - I don't want the wheel
reinvented, I just want to carry one wheel, instead of three. :)

I tried a 6v flashlight battery on top of the fridge, and Wow! It was
rather energizing for the 1st two days, so that I took it off at
night the first time.  

It feels as though the coils on top cause the energy to go up and
out. I didn't like it on the pc. It felt as though the energy wasn't
being released high enough away, and was bothersome. I think again,
because the coils were transforming the energy in a way the D's
don't, which I stil have on my pc.

The pascalite, like some other clays, absorb radiation, that's why
some people find it beneficial to place in front of their pcs.

~ Snoshoe (I'm not the person, someone asked if I was another
member, not sure which that was.)



--- In [hidden email], Vinny Pinto <vinny@...> wrote:

>
> Hi Christine:
>
> To answer briefly from my own perspective: yes, all of matter, and
> even all of free space, and of course, all living systems, are
> electromagnetic in nature, and yes, elements do have signatures if
> tested in certain ways, but it still inaccurate to state that they
> are significant emitters of EMF energies!
>
> with care,
> --Vinny
>
> At 11:05 AM 10/12/2006, you wrote:
> > > >Somewhere, sombody wrote:> >> EMF and chemicals are two
different
> >things, and do not have a
> > > >> correlation.
> >
> >Chemicals do have frequency 'signatures' (see 'files' 23rd Annual
> >International Symposium on Man & His Environment by Cyril Smith)
which
> >are "entrained by a person's endogenous frequency" given sufficient
> >exposure. Smith states, "a chemical frequency signature locks up
that
> >particular frequency within the affected part of the living system
and
> >prevents normal fluctuations in response to the demands of
metabolism
> >or the environment at that frequency." Dr. William Rae also cites
in
> >medical studies frequent coincidence of chemical sensitivity with
ES.
> >So, yes, chemicals and EMF ARE two different things yet they have
in
> >common frequencies which may potentially be correlates. Either one
> >triggering the other resulting in ES/ChemS.
> >
> >Accept my apology if I have taken the above statement out of
context or
> >am stating to you the known or obvious. - Christine
> > > >
> >
> >