>Vinny wrote:
> Many devices or methods
>which may help less-sensitive people may seem to fail rather
>miserably when people who are quite ill with ES/EHS try to use them,
>simply due to the fact that the ES/EHS in these cases is often a
>symptom of a deeper underlying disturbance or deficiency.
>
>Shivani replies:
> Or perhaps less-sensitive people profit more from placebos. It is
>definitely not a "fact" that the ES in the cases of those not helped
>by various
>devices (that make no meterable difference in one's exposure) is "often a
>symptom of a deeper disturbance or deficiency."
> The first thing an ES person needs to do is thoroughly assess his/her
>exposures using proper meters, then undertake remediation that
>cleans up his/her
>personal EM frequency environment in a meterable way. To neglect to do
>this, while spending money on various gizmos that make no meterable
>difference,
>makes little sense.
> I am all for improving nutrition, removing toxic metal
> fillings and root
>canals, and anything else that can be done to lower stress and improve
>general health. But it is absurd for an ES person to fail to
>assess/remediate
>his/her personal EM frequency environment. And illogical to
>presume that if
>various gizmos don't help that the fault must be in the sufferer!
> Vinny, will you please share this message with "Joe?"
> Regards,
> Shivani
> Life Energies
>