https://www.es-forum.com/Anyone-consider-whether-LED-cellphones-are-worse-tp1542256p1542368.html
So, I need a little more explanation for those recordings. I heard
voices. I don't think that trees talk, do they? :-) Were they
> Plants are fine antennas.
>
> On:
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina109.html>
> I have placed the receiving sounds of some trees.
>
> So it is quite normal (?) that plants receive signals, although it may kill
> them.
>
> Many years ago a german farmer had a tree dying.
> He placed a big screw in it, connected a big wire to it, and connected the
> wire to an earth grounding rod farther away.
> The dying tree recovered completely.
> The roots became healthy and the humus around the tree wai in order again.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "minnimall" <
[hidden email]>
> To: <
[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 16:58
> Subject: [eSens] Re: Anyone consider whether LED cellphones are worse?
>
>
>> How is this relevant to what the engineer said on the PDF book?
>>
>> I suggest you attempt to contact him directly - via feb.se - if you
>> seek the absolute truth.
>>
>> Because as I've said, there's theory, and then there's real-life
>> experience which debunks science.
>>
>> Some people choose to remain die-hard scientists - it's their choice.
>>
>> Minni
>>
>>
>> --- In
[hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Measuring is a profession in itsself.
>>>
>>> Not many people do know for instance that a good spectrumanalyser
>> is a
>>> source for a lot of radiation.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Charles Claessens
>>> member Verband Baubiologie
>>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>>> www.milieuziektes.be
>>> www.hetbitje.nl
>>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "minnimall" <minnimall@...>
>>> To: <
[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 10:00
>>> Subject: [eSens] Re: Anyone consider whether LED cellphones are
>> worse?
>>>
>>>
>>> > All I can say is that I have no doubt many people are like me and
>> the
>>> > engineer in the PDF book Black On White (page 114 by Granlund-
>> Lind).
>>> >
>>> > That engineer's job was to check out fields via Holaday meter. But
>>> > (as is the case with so many others who debunked science when
>>> > disproven by REAL-LIFE) he discovered the scientific instruments
>> to
>>> > be white elephants. Why?
>>> > Because he was much more able to tolerate a smelting plant EVEN
>>> > THOUGH the smelting plant registered high on his professional
>> meter,
>>> > yet he was MUCH LESS able to tolerate office environments which
>>> > registered negligible on his meter.
>>> >
>>> > So - what do offices have that smelting plants don't?
>>> > Fluoresent lights & fluoresent monitors.
>>> > That's what!
>>> >
>>> > Thus my point - that FLUORESCENT LEDs on cellphones, i.m.h.o are
>> what
>>> > *exacerbate* cellphone dangers multifold.
>>> >
>>> > I'm not concerned because I don't use cellphones.
>>> > Just consider me similar to the boy in the Emperor's New Clothes.
>>> > Pointing out something which may not have occured to anyone.
>>> > I thought it appropriate to warn people here, since that's what
>> the
>>> > group is about.
>>> > End of story.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --- In
[hidden email], "S. Andreason" <sandreas41@> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Minni,
>>> >>
>>> >> I would think the emissions from the device to be as likely a
>>> > source of
>>> >> problems. Do you have a Electromagnetic Radiation Meter, like the
>>> > Zap
>>> >> Checker? <a href="
http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#445"> It is
>> much
>>> > more
>>> >> sensitive than the Trifield meter. Almost as sensitive as I am.
>>> >>
>>> >> Just like using a Gauss meter to measure magnetic fields, it is
>>> > equally
>>> >> revealing to measure the wireless range of emissions.
>>> >> It also allows you to compare different models and manufacturers,
>>> > as
>>> >> each device IS different.
>>> >> Stewart
>>> >>
>>> >> minnimall wrote:
>>> >> > Maybe the fluorescense emitted from cellphone LED panels may
>> make
>>> > those
>>> >> > cellphones way more harmful than the older cellphones? Because
>>> > LIGHT
>>> >> > itself is radiation.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > While I myself am not a cellphone user, yet I *do* find the LED
>>> > on my
>>> >> > digital camera VERY irritating.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > P.S. Take this as a rhetorical post - over & out ;-)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Minni
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>