Re: Anyone consider whether LED cellphones are worse?

Posted by charles-4 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Anyone-consider-whether-LED-cellphones-are-worse-tp1542256p1542343.html

Measuring is a profession in itsself.

Not many people do know for instance that a good spectrumanalyser is a
source for a lot of radiation.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus



----- Original Message -----
From: "minnimall" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 10:00
Subject: [eSens] Re: Anyone consider whether LED cellphones are worse?


> All I can say is that I have no doubt many people are like me and the
> engineer in the PDF book Black On White (page 114 by Granlund-Lind).
>
> That engineer's job was to check out fields via Holaday meter. But
> (as is the case with so many others who debunked science when
> disproven by REAL-LIFE) he discovered the scientific instruments to
> be white elephants. Why?
> Because he was much more able to tolerate a smelting plant EVEN
> THOUGH the smelting plant registered high on his professional meter,
> yet he was MUCH LESS able to tolerate office environments which
> registered negligible on his meter.
>
> So - what do offices have that smelting plants don't?
> Fluoresent lights & fluoresent monitors.
> That's what!
>
> Thus my point - that FLUORESCENT LEDs on cellphones, i.m.h.o are what
> *exacerbate* cellphone dangers multifold.
>
> I'm not concerned because I don't use cellphones.
> Just consider me similar to the boy in the Emperor's New Clothes.
> Pointing out something which may not have occured to anyone.
> I thought it appropriate to warn people here, since that's what the
> group is about.
> End of story.
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], "S. Andreason" <sandreas41@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Minni,
>>
>> I would think the emissions from the device to be as likely a
> source of
>> problems. Do you have a Electromagnetic Radiation Meter, like the
> Zap
>> Checker? <a href="http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#445"> It is much
> more
>> sensitive than the Trifield meter. Almost as sensitive as I am.
>>
>> Just like using a Gauss meter to measure magnetic fields, it is
> equally
>> revealing to measure the wireless range of emissions.
>> It also allows you to compare different models and manufacturers,
> as
>> each device IS different.
>> Stewart
>>
>> minnimall wrote:
>> > Maybe the fluorescense emitted from cellphone LED panels may make
> those
>> > cellphones way more harmful than the older cellphones? Because
> LIGHT
>> > itself is radiation.
>> >
>> > While I myself am not a cellphone user, yet I *do* find the LED
> on my
>> > digital camera VERY irritating.
>> >
>> > P.S. Take this as a rhetorical post - over & out ;-)
>> >
>> > Minni
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>