Posted by
Vinny Pinto on
Aug 30, 2006; 9:11pm
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/coherent-space-website-tp1542144p1542178.html
Hi Marc:
Regarding what you wrote below, namely:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
However, in your description of your coherent space devices, I believe
that you said that the devices take incoherent radiation and turn
it into coherent radiation? So if I'm sitting in front of a 21" CRT
monitor with it's elevated radiation levels, I'm now going to be
exposed to elevated levels of coherent radiation, correct? That seems
like it would be a much different experience than being in the
middle of nowhere, which would have minimal levels of incoherent
radiation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
No, that is not literally true, and particularly not true for
classical Hertzian EMF fields. However, the full answer would take me
a few paragraphs, and am too busy right now in the lab (where my cat,
Isis, has decided that she is my Chief Scientist and thus insists on
helping me with everything that I do in there...), but will try to
write a longer and meaningful reply on this topic sometime after
Saturday afternoon, when most of my projects should be done...
with care,
--Vinny
At 10:40 AM 8/30/2006, you wrote:
> > 2) any effects noted due to removal of some or most of the harmful
> > effects of EMF should be rather similar to the effects noted from
> > moving to an extremely remote forested area which is very far removed
> > from the AC power grid and from the vast majority of radio and TV
> > transmitting towers and cellular and microwave towers.
>
>Yes, that certainly would be nice. All of the EMF protection devices
>I've ever tried seem to add their own unique energy to the environment,
>which is quite different from going to "the middle of nowhere".
>
>However, in your description of your coherent space devices, I believe
>that you said that the devices take incoherent radiation and turn
>it into coherent radiation? So if I'm sitting in front of a 21" CRT
>monitor with it's elevated radiation levels, I'm now going to be
>exposed to elevated levels of coherent radiation, correct? That seems
>like it would be a much different experience than being in the
>middle of nowhere, which would have minimal levels of incoherent
>radiation.
>
>Marc
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]
phone 301-694-1249
To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us