Re: coherent space website
Posted by
bbin37 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/coherent-space-website-tp1542144p1542167.html
--- In
[hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:
>
> > 2) any effects noted due to removal of some or most of the harmful
> > effects of EMF should be rather similar to the effects noted from
> > moving to an extremely remote forested area which is very far removed
> > from the AC power grid and from the vast majority of radio and TV
> > transmitting towers and cellular and microwave towers.
>
> Yes, that certainly would be nice. All of the EMF protection devices
> I've ever tried seem to add their own unique energy to the environment,
> which is quite different from going to "the middle of nowhere".
>
> However, in your description of your coherent space devices, I believe
> that you said that the devices take incoherent radiation and turn
> it into coherent radiation? So if I'm sitting in front of a 21" CRT
> monitor with it's elevated radiation levels, I'm now going to be
> exposed to elevated levels of coherent radiation, correct? That seems
> like it would be a much different experience than being in the
> middle of nowhere, which would have minimal levels of incoherent
> radiation.
>
> Marc
>
Hi Marc,
What you're pondering here sounds a lot like what Dietrich says his
bioprotect card's action does, i.e. changes the quality of the
radiation. Myself and another person found the result too much for
our systems to handle when we tried the card almost 2 years ago.
I think your take that the results of making EMR coherent would
probably be much different than being in an EMR free zone is spot on.
While making EMR coherent might dampen effects stemming from factors
active with high levels of incoherency, it can definitely amplify
other effects the EMR might have. A simple example is laser light
which is light with very high levels of coherence.
-B