Posted by snoshoe_2 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Garth-I-have-more-now-tp1541394p1541435.html

I knew I'd forget something.

Before that, I thought it might be good to add a definition of
radiation, and radioactivity to this as well.

Radiation n.
1.The act or process of radiating: the radiation of heat and light
from a fire.
2.Physics:
Emission and propagation and emission of energy in the form of rays
or waves.
Energy radiated or transmitted as rays, waves, in the form of
particles.
A stream of particles or electromagnetic waves emitted by the atoms
and molecules of a radioactive substance as a result of nuclear decay.
3.a.The act of exposing or the condition of being exposed to such
energy.
b.The application of such energy, as in medical treatment.
4.Anatomy. Radial arrangement of parts, as of a group of nerve fibers
connecting different areas of the brain.
5.The spread of a group of organisms into new habitats.
Adaptive radiation.

Radioactivity n.
1.Spontaneous emission of radiation, either directly from unstable
atomic nuclei or as a consequence of a nuclear reaction.
2.The radiation, including alpha particles, nucleons, electrons, and
gamma rays, emitted by a radioactive substance.

So the part I forgot. Whether the pails have water, fluoride and they
sit together open, I don't know if the pails previously mentioned are
open? Although from the below, it doesn't really matter entirely.

They are both going to radiate something, even if just through
evaporation. But which more? I'm sure most of us have done the
experiments in early school years and know the scent will radiate and
fill up the room in a short time. Or added dye to water and watched
the color spread. I realize that is not quite the same, but I think
it gives the same picture.

Another way to look at it; I am water. A hyper little first grader is
fluorine. :)
Fluorine is the most electronegative, or very active element there is.

We are both assigned to sit side by side in chairs. Just
sitting "still", one of us is vibrating at a much higher level, even
though we are in the same room, at the same temp. One is less
stable. :)
Who do you think is going to be that little electron that finally
loses it, going from static to kinetic energy and spins out of
control off it's home base the chair and off to zooming around the
room as a free radical until it finds something preferable to occupy
it? Fluorine? You got it. :) Chemical electricity in motion. (We
already know you can't have electricity w/o a magnetic field.)

~ Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], "snoshoe_2" <nonengbunny@...> wrote:
>
> Well put I think Bbin. (And Garth too.) If it seemed I was
confusing
> emf and chemicals, that is not the case, although again it depends
on
> the level you look at it, in energy or "just" solid matter.
>
> "But some people do react to chemicals just in proximity in
> > a hermetically sealed container, no mass contact involved. The
> nature > of this interaction is not well understood, but it could
be
> due to the > energetic emissions of the substances involved. But
some
> type > of energetic signature interaction seems plausible since
> people can > react to holding a homeopathic remedy made from a
> chemical even if > their is no longer any of the chemical present,
> say like in a 200C> preparation."  
>
> This rather proves the point right here don't you think? Look at
how
> unaccepted things like scalar waves have been, and Tesla's info.
and
> just how far technology and science have advanced in the last 30
> years from so many things that "were not" at that time, because it
> was not familiar, not necessarily unknown.
>
> I was just listening to part of a show I caught about quantum
physics
> and current experiments earlier this week. They were talking about
> it, and how things can be affected from a distance. It boils down
to
> frequencies and resonance. Also stated that the world's biggest
> pollution now is electrosmog. (Anybody familiar with black boxes
from
> 20 years ago? Emits the the frequency of the enclosed item, having
> it's vibrational effects on it's target- or sometimes unintended
> target. Effects good or bad depending. There was no direct contact
> between the original source and the recipient.)
>
> Because all things, ALL things, have an inherent emf. That is one
of
> the laws of radiation. "All things emit radiation." Looking at Dr.
> Carey Reams' work again; he figured out the frequency for humans.
The
> further out it goes, the finer tuned it gets, till it is uniquely
us
> as an individual. If our large earth has it's own, and us, why not
> the smaller things?
>
> Let's go back to the beginnings a bit. That all things have an emf
is
> one of the first things you'll learn about electromagnetism. Heck,
> this is being taught in highschool physics now. Every one of those
> frequencies has it's own wavelength, sound, and it's own color.
>
> I don't know if anyone noticed I posted a link with a list of the
> frequency in Hz for many elements?  
>
> The frequency of each of them can also be found on a table of
> elements here: BIG FAT Sigh. It's not any of the ones I thought,
so
> I'll have to look some more. I'll try and find it. Okay, my
> connection is tryint to drop, this is not the one I wanted, but it
> may be useful: http://www.chem.tamu.edu/services/NMR/periodic/
>
> Wikipedia has a nice definition and outline of the spectrum. The
> wavelengths, frequencies, and electrical energy.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum
>
> If you have the frequency, wavelength, color, or sound, you can
find
> out the rest of these about any item. There are converters like
the
> one on this page or others:
>
http://www.cem.msu.edu/~reusch/VirtualText/Spectrpy/InfraRed/infrared. there