Posted by Garth Hitchens on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Garth-I-have-more-now-tp1541394p1541405.html

>> Marc Says:
>> I'm still wondering what all this has to do with electrical
>> sensitivity? Sure, everything puts out some sort of electromagnetic
>> field, but I don't think this group is for people who are having
>> a hypersensitive reaction to the EMF produced by a blade of grass.
>> This is more for people having problems with computers, power lines,
>> cell phones, transmission towers, etc.

> Charles Says:
> I fully agree with you.
> These discussions, however interesting, should not be held in this
> group.

I fully agree too.

That was my point in challenging the claim that chemicals (like
flourides, halides) emitted EMF. I maintain that sensitivity to
these chemicals is chemical sensitivity, not due to some mysterious
EMF that they emit.

In a final response to the last post, neither thermography nor
spectroscopy would show that a bucket of sodium fluoride emits more
EMF (or light, or infrared, for that matter) than the bucket of
water. It may absorb different frequencies of light, as measured
in spectroscopy, but it wouldn't emit any more EMF.

I guess I feel I've made my point, and won't post further on this
matter.