Re: Garth, I have more now...

Posted by tayloka_40 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Garth-I-have-more-now-tp1541394p1541401.html

I understand the your contention now, Garth. My apology. Instead of giving abstracts, I
found millions, since you have the background in chemistry and physics I thought I would
send you two sites for standards and practices for measuring electromagnetic frequencies
of organic and inorganic mass (animal, plants, space, humans etc).

The basis of this technology is applied in pharmocology research and derrivation of
chemical compounds targeting bioprocesses.

The two processes for scientifcally measuring Electromagnetic frequency arespectroscopy
and thermagraphy.

There is an excellent educational site that provides information about all elements having
electromagnetic frequency emission measured in Infrared. Everyone might find this
interesting....I am kind of nerd with this stuff http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach/Edu/
Spectra/irspec.html

The next technique for measuring the emission of electromagnetic elements, including
those that make up electricity, is thermology, these techniques are better used in organic
(animal or human) measures of EM, or status of electrical sensativity. Within the
Engineering webnet, I found this for you, and everyone really, to take a look at.

http://www.temperatures.com/tiapps.html

Then, since standards organisations such as the UN, know of EMF emissions from
smelting, and other manufacturing operations, they have emission controls. I used a
search phrase such as....UN Standards for EMF Gas Emission.

This is directly related to elevated earth temperatures and the Green HouseModel for
atmospheric elevations in temperature. I believe the gas frequency they measure, by units
of temperature, is CO2.

I hope this helps. Thanks for giving me this opportunity.

Karen

--- In [hidden email], Garth Hitchens <garth@...> wrote:

>
> > Hello Garth, I thought I would send this link off to you. These are  
> > military projects that are
> > measuring EMF (emittance frequecy) for application across a wide  
> > variety of areas.
>
> Thanks Karen, I did review the link you sent. I looked at every  
> occurrence of the word "frequency" or "EMF". Unfortunately, I  
> didn't see any abstracts that even mentioned the notion that  
> chemicals or materials emit electromagnetic fields. The phrase  
> "emittance frequency" didn't appear anywhere in the document, and  
> "EMF" only appeared in a system for measuring vibration in propellers  
> rotating in water.
>
> At this point, I would respectfully repeat my assertion that although  
> chemicals such as fluorine or halides may be toxic, there is no  
> evidence for the claim that they 'emit' EMF.
>