> That was my first thought ! Jamming includes still more em emissions
> I imagine. Now, I wouldn't say no to a dedicated machine use for
> targeting the emf, ahahah. In fact that would be the best thing we
> could come up with. Smart sabotage of phone mast, dect phone, wifi.
>
> Yesterday, I measured a peak at 50 uW for the dect signal. No wonder
> I need a lot of coffee in the morning to wake up. But today I feel a
> little bit better, because I put an aluminium paper shield against
> the dect signal(I measured that it didn't make much worse the phone
> mast signal coming from the opposite direction). But I doubt I'm
> gonna have a lasting break.
>
> jean.
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:
>>
>> It is like chasing the devil with Satan.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Marc Martin" <marc@...>
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 21:16
>> Subject: Re: [eSens] JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS
>>
>>
>> >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS
> THERE A
>> >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB
> RADIO. !!!
>> >
>> > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming
> device?
>> >
>> > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...
>> >
>> > Marc
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>