Posted by canaryyuk on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/reply-to-Marc-tp1539966p1540003.html

As i have said in another post, my theory is that MW RF is the root
cause of my gut dysbiosis, it therefore makes sense to cut THAT out.

The alternative for me would be going on a lifelong diet that
excludes a monumental amount of foodstuffs, we're talking the kind of
diet someone whith terminal cancer would baulk at considering.

I get irritated when i feel that ppl on such hugely restrictive diets
are not open about how UTTERLY MISERABLE the diet makes them. If
diets were easy there would be no overweight people on the planet.  
There would be no drug addicts or alcoholics either. Its all the
same thing, addiction. It is a well known fact that only a tiny
percentage of drug addicts, or alcoholics succeed in conquering their
habit. I imagine the same goes for people when faced with the
prospect of a life without a SINGLE dietary reward. ITS BOLLOCKS.

So maybe this illness separates the men from the boys. Some will
succeed, even thrive. Many others will just limp along their whole
lives.

So be it.

--- In [hidden email], Evie <evie15422@y...> wrote:
>
> hi again, Jane,
>    
> When I wrote you re the spelt, quercitin, etc.... I wrote
because I assume that the ppl who are ES and react positively to a
diet change do so because they have a condition OTHER than ES that is
necessitating that diet change. IE: coeliac disease, dysbiosis,
diabetes, hypothyroid..... I don't believe anyone without a
condition necessitating a diet change will react positively to one,
whether one has ES or not. However, there are many underlying,
little recognized conditions which DO necessitate a diet change and
if you have one of these conditions, you had better be prepared to
deal with it or you will never recover from the underlying condition
or from ES. Floating down the river of DeNile is never a good
thing. ;)  
>    
> Good health to you,
> Diane aka Evie
>
> canaryyuk <canary65@t...> wrote:
> It seems to me there are 2 main ways of alleviating ES and ppl
choose
> which one suits them best. One can either follow a strict
exclusion
> diet (for life) or one can choose to create or move to an
> environmental exclusion zone.  
>
> Personally, i lean towards the latter option. I have a healthy
well
> balanced diet, all organic, home-cooked foods, i pay attention to
> what i eat, but i do not feel that exclusion diets (for me at any
> rate) are a realistic option. The resultant misery is as bad as
the
> illness itself. The average human's attachment to food and the
> rewards it offers, run deep, and cannot be dismissed lightly.  
>
> I totally agree that ppl should educate themselves about diet and
try is
> already a bit weak
> > > or sensitive. This does not mean that the most sensible
> approach only
> > > involves trying to strengthen those exhibiting sensitivity,
> though, does it?
> >
> > Well, someone who is already "a bit weak or sensitive" most
likely person
> > could get ES purely through exposure to EMF. However, I think a
> more
> > typical scenario would be multi-factoral. For example, a buildup
of
> > heavy metals in the system, a lack of fatty acids or minerals in
the wellness program Health promotion and wellness Health and
wellness promotion Business health wellness Service.