Posted by
charles-4 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Reply-to-canary-tp1539964p1539999.html
Hello,
you may have a look at:
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina100.htmlunder Elektrosmog and Symptoms.
It is all High Frequency.
However, many studies have shown, that when those high frequency signals are
not pulsed, the damage to our body is much less, than in the case, that the
HF signals ate pulsed.
In comparison, Radio and TV signals are not pulsed.
There the strenght of the signals is important.
The pulsed signals of the mobile phones and masts do not need to be in
strenght, in order to achieve damage.
Very, very low levels of their radiation are sufficient in order to make
people sick.
Also, low levels of low frequency signals, like the *dirt* in our mains
voltage cables, can be devastating as well.
Even the normal 50 or 60 Hz may make the mercury come out of our amalgam
tooth fillings much faster than normal.
Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Kemp" <
[hidden email]>
To: <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:24
Subject: RE: [eSens] RF and MW
> Interesting, well it's quite possible. The point I was making however is
> that most people see radio/TV as low/acceptable risk (compared with the
> perceived benefits). Like petrol for cars, smoking and drinking alcohol!
>
>
>
> Unfortunately we may have got to the point where so many people see their
> mobiles as indispensable that it will be extremely difficult to reduce
> their
> use, even if a health link is proved. Never mind about big business -
> once
> the general public has accepted something, it is very difficult to
> reverse,
> even by legislation (as shown by the Puritans in Britain in the 1650's and
> Prohibition in the USA in the 1930's). I guess however that the gradual
> growth of smoking legislation shows that limits can be achieved if there's
> general agreement about the risk.
>
>
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From:
[hidden email] [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Andrew McAfee
> Sent: 22 November 2005 03:18
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [eSens] RF and MW
>
>
>
> I believe there is data that supports the claim that FM and TV towers
> increase skin cancer.
> Andrew
> On Nov 21, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Ian Kemp wrote:
>
>> they've been around in our atmosphere for 100+ years and
>> nobody has suffered", which is probably true of the AM and FM radio
>> bands
>> and small amounts of microwaves (e.g. from radar).
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "eSens <
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens> " on
> the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
[hidden email]
> <mailto:
[hidden email]?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>