Posted by evie15422 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/reply-to-Marc-tp1539966p1539997.html

hi again, Jane,

When I wrote you re the spelt, quercitin, etc.... I wrote because I assume that the ppl who are ES and react positively to a diet change do so because they have a condition OTHER than ES that is necessitating that diet change. IE: coeliac disease, dysbiosis, diabetes, hypothyroid..... I don't believe anyone without a condition necessitating a diet change will react positively to one, whether one has ES or not. However, there are many underlying, little recognized conditions which DO necessitate a diet change and if you have one of these conditions, you had better be prepared to deal with it or you will never recover from the underlying condition or from ES. Floating down the river of DeNile is never a good thing. ;)

Good health to you,
Diane aka Evie

canaryyuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
It seems to me there are 2 main ways of alleviating ES and ppl choose
which one suits them best. One can either follow a strict exclusion
diet (for life) or one can choose to create or move to an
environmental exclusion zone.

Personally, i lean towards the latter option. I have a healthy well
balanced diet, all organic, home-cooked foods, i pay attention to
what i eat, but i do not feel that exclusion diets (for me at any
rate) are a realistic option. The resultant misery is as bad as the
illness itself. The average human's attachment to food and the
rewards it offers, run deep, and cannot be dismissed lightly.

I totally agree that ppl should educate themselves about diet and try
and curb the worst excesses but i do not feel that adopting an ever
more exlusive diet in order to compensate for an increasingly toxic
external environment is the way forward, for me at least.

jane


--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@u...> wrote:
>
> > Electromagnetic fields are a potent toxin, a 24/7 stresssor.
Of
> > course any toxin/stress will affect more adversely anyone who is
already a bit weak
> > or sensitive. This does not mean that the most sensible
approach only
> > involves trying to strengthen those exhibiting sensitivity,
though, does it?
>
> Well, someone who is already "a bit weak or sensitive" most likely
got that
> way through previous traumas, toxins or poor nutrition. That is
NOT to
> say that I'm blaming the victim, as in many cases people do not
choose
> to be traumatized or poisoned...
>
> And the most sensible approach is the one which works. Certainly
some
> avoidance & fixing wiring errors or faulty electronics may be
required
> or helpful, but that will often only take you so far in your
recovery.
> The rest has to come from improving one's overall health.
>
> I'm sure it's theoretically possible that a perfectly healthy person
> could get ES purely through exposure to EMF. However, I think a
more
> typical scenario would be multi-factoral. For example, a buildup of
> heavy metals in the system, a lack of fatty acids or minerals in the
> diet, an ongoing infection, etc.
>
> Marc
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Health and wellness Health wellness product Health and wellness program Health promotion and wellness Health and wellness promotion Business health wellness

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "eSens" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[hidden email]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]