Posted by canaryyuk on Nov 20, 2005; 8:41pm
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Reply-to-canary-tp1539964p1539971.html

When i talk about RF I mean pulsed microwave RF as emitted from
wireless devices. I do not know how to refer to this so that it is
not confused with other types of RF....will microwave RF do? or
pulsed RF?

In Canada, with its big open spaces, i'm sure it is still possible to
get away from wireless technology, but Britain is COOKING. I believe
it is probably the worst country in the world for wireless RF
emissions, being so small, overcrowded and heavily industrialised.

This is why i think that when a person suspects they are sensitive to
EMFs, the first thing they should investigate is the RF coming from
wireless devices into their home, and their microwave RF exposure
generally.

jane

--- In [hidden email], SArjuna@a... wrote:
>
>
> > Canary wrote?
> > the only query i have to raise with martin weatherall regarding
his
> > powerful and eloquent article is why, when in nearly every case he
> > cites he discovered that wireless RF microwaves were the main
cause
> > of illness, why does he put RF emmissions at No.5 on his list of
> > possible causes of ES.  Surely they should be at No. 1. 
> >
> Shivani replies:
> I have no contact info. for Weatherall, so I can only
theorize. RF is
> they culprit in every case, it's just a question of the source.  
In his own
> case, the source was the utility current. In the other cases he
mentions he
> found wireless sources. If he is activley involved in
remediation I am
> sure he could have mentioned many other cases of utility current RF
causing
> illness, but chose the cases he did because they demonstrate a
variety of sources, from
> wireless sources. This is not so. It is particularly the RF
in utility
> current/ground current that causes it to create health symptoms.  
It does not
> matter what the source is. ES people need to look for and
identify all the
> sources they are exposed to, then address them.
> Not everyone will be exposed to wireless RF, even in today's
blue world,
> but very few indeed will not be exposed to RF via their wiring.  
At our
> home, for instance, we have no wireless exposure to speak of, but
plenty of RF
> via the utility.  
> In addition, some recent remediations have demonstrated that
in
> buildings near MW towers, filtering what is in the wiring has
indeed reduced symptoms
> that began when the tower exposures began. Research on this
needs to be
> done. The theory is that the ground currents created by the
support equipment
> for the towers deliver RF to the buildings that ends up on their
wiring.