Posted by randolf_everywhere-3 on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/World-Health-Organization-vs-electro-smog-victims-tp1539929p1539932.html

Hello,

the WHO is not worth to talk about it is only worth to fight against.
DR Rath wants to replace the WHO with another organisation which
serves much more the people and not the industry.

Randolf Weinand

-- In [hidden email], SArjuna@a... wrote: ill?
>
> According to PooBahs at the World Health Organization, you've only
come down
> with "Idiopathic Environment Intolerance" (IEI).
>
> Summer smog visible on the skyline over cities like Toronto and
Los Angeles
> provides a perfect seasonal soapbox for headline hungry
politicians.
>
> No politician or environmental activist is doing anything about
the
> electricity pollution that an increasing number of people say is
making them ill, and
> certainly not WHO.
>
> WHO, which last week held a workshop on "Electrical
Hypersensitivity", in
> Prague, Czech Republic wrote off global victims of electricity
pollution and
> electrosmog-and included a recommendation advising governments
to "discourage
> measurement in homes".
>
> If electrosmog is not creating problems for human health, then why
would WHO
> discourage measurement of electric magnetic fields in homes?
>
> Retired Toronto police officer Martin Weatherall, who suffers from
an illness
> he believes was brought on by electricity pollution, says WHO may
someday be
> found "criminally irresponsible" in writing off the victims of
electrosmog.
>
> Weatherall, who works on behalf of other victims of electricity
pollution,
> has dispatched a letter to WHO Director General Lee Jong Wok,
included here: Electrical
> Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004.
Working Group
> Meeting". I am now writing to advise you how disappointed I am
with some of the
> recommendations. In particular, I am referring to the
recommendations on page 8
> under the headings Information for the General Public and Advice
to Governments,
> both of which include the point: "discourage measurements in
homes".
>
> This advice to the General Public and to Governments is so
completely
> contrary to sensible thinking and so fundamentally wrong that the
World Health
> Organization may be criminally liable for offences in the
countries that follow
> these guidelines. I base this statement on my own experience and
situations where
> I have had personal involvement.
>
> If the WHO is considering only simple EMFs as being the cause of
many
> people's illnesses, the WHO is quite wrong. A better way to
describe the real problem including cellular
> telephones, radar and wireless devices.
>
> If the WHO is not willing to consider how all of these problems
interact and
> cause health problems, the WHO will fail to diagnose the true
cause of many
> severe illnesses and will fail in its duties to the world
population.
>
> In the WHO document, the working group has chosen a description
other than
> electro hypersensitivity and has called the illnesses "Idiopathic
Environmental
> Intolerance' (IEI). My description is a little more simple to
understand and
> is more to the point - "electrical and radio frequency radiation
poisoning".
> The persons that you refer to as IEI suffer their illnesses only
after being
> exposed to dangerous levels of electrical pollution. They have
been poisoned,
> possibly by one of the above named toxic ingredients, but it is
more likely that
> a mixture of two or more elements caused their illnesses.
>
> It is totally irresponsible for the WHO to discourage the testing
of homes of
> persons suffering from EMFs and other forms of electrical
pollution. Severe
> suffering and even death may result for those who do not get help.
The WHO
> should reverse the current recommendations, and advise complete
and thorough
> testing of victims' homes and, possibly, their workplaces. It is
very important to
> identify and quantify the reasons why so many people are being
made sick by
> electrical pollution. Missing any one of the above "ingredients"
of electrical
> pollution may fail to find the real reason for a victim's sickness
and cause
> further suffering and danger. If several new viruses were causing
death and
> suffering throughout the world, surely the WHO would not simply
say to Governments
> - "do not try to identify them". Why, then, has the WHO ignored
the
> significant health damage already occurring in many countries
because of electrical
> pollution? Is the WHO going to wait until a catastrophic amount of
harm is
> visible to all the population, before taking action?
>
> My own situation is an example of the need to identify and measure
the
> different elements of electrical pollution. Considerable ground
current electricity
> was found inside my home even when all of the electricity was
disconnected.
> High electrical fields were located throughout the basement and on
the telephone
> lines. Electromagnetic fields covered the whole house and were
particularly
> high at the outdoor drilled water well. Various low and high
frequencies were
> located on the electricity flowing through the house. I suffered a
variety of
> very adverse health symptoms and developed prostate cancer within
one year of
> living at my home. My wife and I have been unable to live in our
own house for
> ten months now, and we have been forced to find alternate
accommodation
> because the electrical utility company has refused to correct
problems with their
> distribution system. Canadian health care and government
authorities have failed
> to provide any meaningful assistance or advice about our
electrical pollution
> problem. Without the assistance of an electronics expert who
provided
> detailed measurements, I would not have known what was causing my
illness and would
> have probably continued to grow increasingly ill. Your
recommendations enable
> governments and utility companies to continue their bad and
dangerous
> practices, while at the same time leaving sufferers helpless to
correct their
> situations.
>
> Within the last few weeks, I have been involved in three
situations where the
> measurement of victims' homes resulted in the discovery of
dangerous
> electrical pollution that was causing serious illness. In a rural
house northwest of
> Toronto, a wireless plug-in telephone jack was causing massive
amounts of high
> frequency radiation inside the home. After the wireless jack and
other
> problematic items were unplugged, a female occupant of the home
reported a drastic
> improvement to her health. She was able to walk properly, climb
stairs, and
> sleep all night, which she had not been able to accomplish
previously. She also
> reported that she was no longer experiencing many severe
migraines, only "
> normal" headaches. Only the use of special instruments located the
problematic
> devices that were causing so much harm.
>
> Upon request, I recently attended in Toronto at the apartment of a
woman who
> was disabled by electrical pollution. A defective fluorescent
light fixture in
> the apartment below seemed to be the cause of very high levels of
EMFs that
> were emanating from the kitchen floor. In the bedroom of the same
apartment,
> near to the place where the victim's head lies when she is
sleeping, a very high
> amount of high frequency radiation was discovered coming from the
wall. The
> problem was eventually located in the next apartment, where an
almost new
> wireless telephone was found to be the source of extremely high
amounts of radio
> frequencies. This was a problem even when the telephone was not in
use, and
> simply resting in its cradle. Only careful testing with a variety
of different
> sensitive instruments managed to locate these very serious
electrical pollution
> problems. Unfortunately, the victim is so electrically
hypersensitive that she
> still suffers greatly. In her previous efforts to get help from
doctors, she
> had been referred to psychiatrists and had not been provided with
any
> meaningful help. The WHO recommendations actually encourage this
type of treatment by
> failing, as an organization, to explore the connection between
electrical
> pollution and sickness, and by advising physicians not to search
for causal factors
> when treating victims. Furthermore, the WHO undermines the serious
nature of
> this problem by advising governments that there are no grounds to
use IEI as a
> diagnostic classification.
>
> In a different situation, in a rural home located west of Toronto,
I found
> another wireless telephone that was producing and transmitting
very high levels
> of high frequency radiation, but only when the telephone was
turned on and in
> use. The victim complained of tinnitus, severe ear pain in the
area where the
> receiver was normally held against her head, and severe pain
linked to her
> neck and back. In the short amount of time since this problem was
identified and
> she stopped using the wireless phone, the victim has reported that
her
> injuries have improved by fifty percent.
>
> In the workplace of an assistant professor at a Canadian
University,
> extremely high levels of ground current electricity were located
flowing through his
> office. He has developed such severe sensitivities to the
electrical pollution,
> that he cannot work in that office and is experiencing great
difficulty
> finding a place to live where he does not feel ill. A university
office tower
> located near his office houses many different broadcast and cell
phone antennae.
> Amongst the workers in the top floors of that tower, there are
several persons
> who have developed cancer.
>
> In each of these situations, it was difficult to locate and
identify the
> cause of the harm. Even simple EMF measurements, which you
discourage, would have
> been inadequate. The victims would have continued to be harmed,
their quality
> of life would have been degraded, and their lives would have been
at risk. If
> the WHO continues with its recommendations to discourage the
measurement of
> homes, you will be ensuring that many people will suffer, become
ill, and
> possibly die, and that the real causes of their sicknesses will
not be identified by
> health authorities.
>
> There are clear signs that electrical pollution is becoming a
major health
> problem throughout the developed world. The recommendations from
this working
> group will ensure that the WHO stays "willfully blind" to the
causes of what
> appears to be a major environmental disaster. This health threat
is so
> significant that the WHO should give it highest priority. Instead,
your feeble response
> to date is compromising the safety of those you should be
protecting.
>
> In conclusion, I recommend that the health dangers of electrical
pollution be
> brought to the attention of all governments and health authorities
throughout
> the world. Also, thorough and complete testing of victims' homes
should be
> recommended to governments, health authorities and health care
professionals, so
> that the electrical pollution harming citizens can be identified.
Only by
> this means will the WHO be able to properly recognize the real
causes of these
> illnesses and be in a position to make recommendations for a safer
world
> environment in the future.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Martin Weatherall
>
>
> Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod is an award-winning
journalist
> with 30 years experience in the media. A former Toronto Sun and
Kingston Whig
> Standard columnist, she has also appeared on Newsmax.com, the
Drudge Report,